Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults

被引:6
|
作者
Pourmajidian, Maryam [1 ]
Lauber, Benedikt [2 ]
Sidhu, Simranjit K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Fribourg, Dept Neurosci & Movement Sci, Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
Corticospinal excitability; Neuromodulation; Cycling exercise; Homeostatic metaplasticity; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX PLASTICITY; AEROBIC EXERCISE; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SINGLE BOUT; INDUCTION; TDCS; METAPLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134597
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The study aimed to examine the effect of a pre-conditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) before subsequent anodal-tDCS (atDCS) was applied during low workload cycling exercise on the corticospinal responses in young healthy individuals. Eleven young subjects participated in two sessions receiving either conditioning ctDCS or sham stimulation, followed by atDCS while cycling (i.e. ctDCS-atDCS, sham-atDCS) at 1.2 times their body weight (84 +/- 20 W) in a counterbalanced double-blind design. Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation with the intensity set to produce an MEP amplitude of 1 mV in a resting hand muscle at baseline (PRE), following preconditioning tDCS (POST - COND) and post atDCS combined with cycling exercise (POST-TEST). There was a significant interaction between time and intervention (P < 0.01) on MEPs. MEPs increased from PRE (1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) to POST-TEST (1.3 +/- 0.06 mV) during ctDCS-atDCS (P < 0.001) but did not change significantly across time during sham-atDCS (P > 0.7). Furthermore, MEPs were higher in ctDCS-atDCS compared to sham-atDCS (both P < 0.01) at POST - COND (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.1 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) and POST-TEST (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.3 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV). These outcomes demonstrate that pre-conditioning cathodal tDCS can enhance subsequent corticospinal excitability changes induced by anodal tDCS applied in combination with cycling exercise. The findings have implications for the application of tDCS in combination with cycling exercise in rehabilitation and sporting contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does Cathodal Preconditioning Enhance the Effects of Subsequent Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Grip Strength?
    Lewis, Aidan
    Rattray, Ben
    Flood, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2025, 39 (01) : e1 - e12
  • [2] BOTH ANODAL AND CATHODAL TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION IMPROVES SEMANTIC PROCESSING
    Brueckner, Sabrina
    Kammer, Thomas
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 343 : 269 - 275
  • [3] Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Jamil, Asif
    Fresnoza, Shane
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Vanderschelden, Benjamin
    Ivry, Richard B.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [4] Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex
    Samani, Mohsen Mosayebi
    Agboada, Desmond
    Jamil, Asif
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    CORTEX, 2019, 119 : 350 - 361
  • [5] Effect of Anodal and Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on DLPFC on Modulation of Inhibitory Control in ADHD
    Soltaninejad, Zahra
    Nejati, Vahid
    Ekhtiari, Hamed
    JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2019, 23 (04) : 325 - 332
  • [6] Preconditioning with Cathodal High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Sensitizes the Primary Motor Cortex to Subsequent Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
    Dai, Wenjun
    Geng, Yao
    Liu, Hao
    Guo, Chuan
    Chen, Wenxiang
    Ma, Jinhui
    Chen, Jinjin
    Jia, Yanbing
    Shen, Ying
    Wang, Tong
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2021, 2021
  • [7] Comparison of Neuroplastic Responses to Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Subacute Stroke
    Nicolo, Pierre
    Magnin, Cecile
    Pedrazzini, Elena
    Plomp, Gijs
    Mottaz, Anais
    Schnider, Armin
    Guggisberg, Adrian G.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 99 (05): : 862 - 872
  • [8] Neuroprotective effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in a rat stroke model
    Notturno, Francesca
    Pace, Marta
    Zappasodi, Filippo
    Cam, Etrugul
    Bassetti, Claudio L.
    Uncini, Antonino
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 342 (1-2) : 146 - 151
  • [9] On the Use of the Terms Anodal and Cathodal in High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Technical Note
    Garnett, Emily O.
    Malyutina, Svetlana
    Datta, Abhishek
    den Ouden, Dirk-Bart
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (08): : 705 - 712
  • [10] Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment
    Eryilmaz, Gul
    Erkmen, Husnu
    Gotgcegtoz Gul, Isil
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 16 (02): : 138 - 142