A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies

被引:14
作者
Wong, Xin Yi [1 ]
Chong, Kok Joon [2 ]
van Til, Janine A. [3 ]
Wee, Hwee Lin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Sci, Dept Pharm, Block S4A Level 3,18 Sci Dr 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Planning & Dev, Reg Hlth Syst Planning Off, 1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[3] Univ Twente, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Sch Management & Governance, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, 12 Sci Dr 2,10-01, Singapore 117549, Singapore
关键词
Breast cancer; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Genetic testing; Personalised screening; Qualitative; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI; RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; BENEFITS; DENSITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Breast cancer is the top cancer by incidence and mortality in Singaporean women. Mammography is by far its best screening tool, but current recommended age and interval may not yield the most benefit. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to improve discriminatory accuracy of breast cancer risk assessment models. This study was conducted to understand Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and SNPs gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies. Methods: Focus group discussions were conducted among English-speaking women (n = 27) between 40 to 65 years old, both current and lapsed mammogram users. Women were divided into four groups based on age and mammogram usage. Discussions about breast cancer and screening experience, as well as perception and attitude towards SNPs gene testing were conducted by an experienced moderator. Women were also asked for factors that will influence their uptake of the test. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis to captured similarities and differences in views expressed. Results: Barriers to repeat mammogram attendance include laziness to make appointment and painful and uncomfortable screening process. However, the underlying reason may be low perceived susceptibility to breast cancer. Facilitators to repeat mammogram attendance include ease of making appointment and timely reminders. Women were generally receptive towards SNPs gene testing, but required information on accuracy, cost, invasiveness, and side effects before they decide whether to go for it. Other factors include waiting time for results and frequency interval. On average, women gave a rating of 7.5 (range 5 to 10) when asked how likely they will go for the test. Conclusion: Addressing concerns such as pain and discomfort during mammogram, providing timely reminders and debunking breast cancer myths can help to improve screening uptake. Women demonstrated a spectrum of responses towards a novel test like SNPs gene testing, but need more information to make an informed decision. Future public health education on predictive genetic testing should adequately address both benefits and risks. Findings from this study is used to inform a discrete choice experiment to empirically quantify women preferences and willingness-to-pay for SNPs gene testing.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Assessing Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Assessment Models [J].
Amir, Eitan ;
Freedman, Orit C. ;
Seruga, Bostjan ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (10) :680-691
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obs Gynecol, V118, P372, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E31822C98E5
[3]  
Bevers TB., 2016, Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Version 1, P24
[4]   Socioeconomic Influences on the Effects of a Genetic Testing Direct-to-Consumer Marketing Campaign [J].
Bowen, D. J. ;
Harris, J. ;
Jorgensen, C. M. ;
Myers, M. F. ;
Kuniyuki, A. .
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2010, 13 (03) :131-142
[5]   Low penetrance breast cancer susceptibility loci are associated with specific breast tumor subtypes: findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium [J].
Broeks, Annegien ;
Schmidt, Marjanka K. ;
Sherman, Mark E. ;
Couch, Fergus J. ;
Hopper, John L. ;
Dite, Gillian S. ;
Apicella, Carmel ;
Smith, Letitia D. ;
Hammet, Fleur ;
Southey, Melissa C. ;
Van 't Veer, Laura J. ;
de Groot, Renate ;
Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M. ;
Fasching, Peter A. ;
Beckmann, Matthias W. ;
Jud, Sebastian ;
Ekici, Arif B. ;
Hartmann, Arndt ;
Hein, Alexander ;
Schulz-Wendtland, Ruediger ;
Burwinkel, Barbara ;
Marme, Frederik ;
Schneeweiss, Andreas ;
Sinn, Hans-Peter ;
Sohn, Christof ;
Tchatchou, Sandrine ;
Bojesen, Stig E. ;
Nordestgaard, Borge G. ;
Flyger, Henrik ;
Orsted, David D. ;
Kaur-Knudsen, Diljit ;
Milne, Roger L. ;
Perez, Jose I. Arias ;
Zamora, Pilar ;
Menendez Rodriguez, Primitiva ;
Benitez, Javier ;
Brauch, Hiltrud ;
Justenhoven, Christina ;
Ko, Yon-Dschun ;
Hamann, Ute ;
Fischer, Hans-Peter ;
Bruening, Thomas ;
Pesch, Beate ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Wang-Gohrke, Shan ;
Bremer, Michael ;
Karstens, Johann H. ;
Hillemanns, Peter ;
Doerk, Thilo ;
Nevanlinna, Heli A. .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2011, 20 (16) :3289-3303
[6]   Genome-wide association analysis in East Asians identifies breast cancer susceptibility loci at 1q32.1, 5q14.3 and 15q26.1 [J].
Cai, Qiuyin ;
Zhang, Ben ;
Sung, Hyuna ;
Low, Siew-Kee ;
Kweon, Sun-Seog ;
Lu, Wei ;
Shi, Jiajun ;
Long, Jirong ;
Wen, Wanqing ;
Choi, Ji-Yeob ;
Noh, Dong-Young ;
Shen, Chen-Yang ;
Matsuo, Keitaro ;
Teo, Soo-Hwang ;
Kim, Mi Kyung ;
Khoo, Ui Soon ;
Iwasaki, Motoki ;
Hartman, Mikael ;
Takahashi, Atsushi ;
Ashikawa, Kyota ;
Matsuda, Koichi ;
Shin, Min-Ho ;
Park, Min Ho ;
Zheng, Ying ;
Xiang, Yong-Bing ;
Ji, Bu-Tian ;
Park, Sue K. ;
Wu, Pei-Ei ;
Hsiung, Chia-Ni ;
Ito, Hidemi ;
Kasuga, Yoshio ;
Kang, Peter ;
Mariapun, Shivaani ;
Ahn, Sei Hyun ;
Kang, Han Sung ;
Chan, Kelvin Y. K. ;
Man, Ellen P. S. ;
Iwata, Hiroji ;
Tsugane, Shoichiro ;
Miao, Hui ;
Liao, Jiemin ;
Nakamura, Yusuke ;
Kubo, Michiaki ;
Delahanty, Ryan J. ;
Zhang, Yanfeng ;
Li, Bingshan ;
Li, Chun ;
Gao, Yu-Tang ;
Shu, Xiao-Ou ;
Kang, Daehee .
NATURE GENETICS, 2014, 46 (08) :886-890
[7]  
Champion V. L., 2008, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED T, V4, P45
[8]   Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement [J].
Darabi, Hatef ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Zhao, Wanting ;
Liu, Jianjun ;
Hall, Per ;
Humphreys, Keith .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (01)
[9]   Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Clinical Models and 77 Independent Risk-Associated SNPs for Women Aged Under 50 Years: Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry [J].
Dite, Gillian S. ;
MacInnis, Robert J. ;
Bickerstaffe, Adrian ;
Dowty, James G. ;
Allman, Richard ;
Apicella, Carmel ;
Milne, Roger L. ;
Tsimiklis, Helen ;
Phillips, Kelly-Anne ;
Giles, Graham G. ;
Terry, Mary Beth ;
Southey, Melissa C. ;
Hopper, John L. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (02) :359-365
[10]  
Ellsworth RE, 2010, CURR GENOMICS, V11, P146, DOI 10.2174/138920210791110951