Do high electricity bills undermine public support for renewables? Evidence from the European Union

被引:13
作者
Aklin, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Polit Sci, 230 S Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Renewable energy; Renewable electricity; Clean energy transition; Energy justice; Electricity bill; FEED-IN TARIFFS; ENERGY JUSTICE; WIND; GENERATION; PRICES; POWER; WHOLESALE; POLICIES; GERMANY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112400
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The clean energy transition has long been framed in terms of its technological and economic feasibility. An increasingly salient constraint lies in its political feasibility. The transition requires vigorous public support to be completed. Yet increased consumer costs associated with the deployment of renewable electricity could make voters - and, by extension, governments - less supportive of it. As a result, overly aggressive government support for renewables could lead to its own downfall. To examine this threat, I document two stylized facts. First, the expansion of renewable electricity capacity has been followed by an increase in household electricity bills, and this has mostly happened because of energy-specific taxes. An increase of renewable electricity capacity by one within-country standard deviation raises a typical household's bill by (sic)5.7 per MWh (95% CI: [3, 8.3]), most of which comes from an increase in non-VAT taxes (+(sic)3.8/MWh [2.6; 5.1]). Second, these taxes have hurt popular support for aggressive renewable energy policy. An increase of non-VAT taxes by one standard deviation increases the share of people who find renewable energy too ambitious by 0.7 percentage points (95% CI: [0.1; 1.3]). Climbing costs could therefore undermine further political support toward renewable electricity deployment and threaten its contribution to greenhouse gas reductions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aklin M., 2018, Renewables: The Politics of a Global Energy Transition
[2]   How robust is the renewable energy industry to political shocks? Evidence from the 2016 U.S. elections [J].
Aklin, Michael .
BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2018, 20 (04) :523-552
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Energy Policies of IEA Countries: Germany 2013
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EN PRIC COSTS EUR
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]   It Is All about Political Incentives: Democracy and the Renewable Feed-in Tariff [J].
Bayer, Patrick ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2016, 78 (02) :603-619
[7]   Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States [J].
Bednar, Dominic J. ;
Reames, Tony G. .
NATURE ENERGY, 2020, 5 (06) :432-439
[8]   Energy poverty policies in the EU: A critical perspective [J].
Bouzarovski, Stefan ;
Petrova, Saska ;
Sarlamanov, Robert .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 49 :76-82
[9]   The political logics of clean energy transitions [J].
Breetz, Hanna ;
Mildenberger, Matto ;
Stokes, Leah .
BUSINESS AND POLITICS, 2018, 20 (04) :492-522
[10]   Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies [J].
Brown, MA .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (14) :1197-1207