The Influence of Different Graphical Displays on Nonexpert Decision Making Under Uncertainty

被引:23
作者
Padilla, Lace M. [1 ]
Hansen, Grace [2 ]
Ruginski, Ian T. [1 ]
Kramer, Heidi S. [1 ]
Thompson, William B. [3 ]
Creem-Regehr, Sarah H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] NIH, Sect Integrat Neuroimaging, Clin Brain Disorders Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Comp, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
uncertainty; decision making; visualization; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; VISUALIZING UNCERTAINTY; ERROR; INFORMATION; INFERENCE; FORECASTS; PICTURES; EYE;
D O I
10.1037/xap0000037
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Understanding how people interpret and use visually presented uncertainty data is an important yet seldom studied aspect of data visualization applications. Current approaches in visualization often display uncertainty as an additional data attribute without a well-defined context. Our goal was to test whether different graphical displays (glyphs) would influence a decision about which of 2 weather forecasts was a more accurate predictor of an uncertain temperature forecast value. We used a statistical inference task based on fictional univariate normal distributions, each characterized by a mean and standard deviation. Participants viewed 1 of 5 different glyph types representing 2 weather forecast distributions. Three of these used variations in spatial encoding to communicate the distributions and the other 2 used nonspatial encoding (brightness or color). Four distribution pairs were created with different relative standard deviations (uncertainty of the forecasts). We found that there was a difference in how decisions were made with spatial versus nonspatial glyphs, but no difference among the spatial glyphs themselves. Furthermore, the effect of different glyph types changed as a function of the variability of the distributions. The results are discussed in the context of how visualizations might improve decision making under uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   Communicating Health Risks With Visual Aids [J].
Garcia-Retamero, Rocio ;
Cokely, Edward T. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 22 (05) :392-399
[12]  
Gigerenzer G., 1999, Simple heuristics that make us smart., P3
[13]  
Hengl T., 2003, P 7 INT C GEO COMPUT, P8
[14]  
Howard D., 1996, CARTOGR GEOGR INFORM, V23, P59, DOI [DOI 10.1559/152304096782562109, https://doi.org/10.1559/152304096782562109]
[15]  
Jiang B., 1995, Technical Papers: American Congress of Surveying and Mapping
[16]  
American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, P291
[17]   The Benefits and Challenges of Predictive Interval Forecasts and Verification Graphics for End Users [J].
Joslyn, Susan ;
Nemec, Lou ;
Savelli, Sonia .
WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY, 2013, 5 (02) :133-147
[18]   Reducing Probabilistic Weather Forecasts to the Worst-Case Scenario: Anchoring Effects [J].
Joslyn, Susan ;
Savelli, Sonia ;
Nadav-Greenberg, Limor .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2011, 17 (04) :342-353
[19]   Communicating forecast uncertainty: public perception of weather forecast uncertainty [J].
Joslyn, Susan ;
Savelli, Sonia .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2010, 17 (02) :180-195
[20]   Uncertainty Forecasts Improve Weather-Related Decisions and Attenuate the Effects of Forecast Error [J].
Joslyn, Susan L. ;
LeClerc, Jared E. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2012, 18 (01) :126-140