Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners' Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework

被引:25
作者
Lim, Seng Boon [1 ]
Malek, Jalaluddin Abdul [1 ]
Yussoff, Md Farabi Yussoff Md [2 ]
Yigitcanlar, Tan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Ctr Res Dev Social & Environm SEEDS, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
[2] Minist Housing & Local Govt, Fed Dept Town & Country Planning, Fed Govt Adm Ctr, Putrajaya 62675, Malaysia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[4] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Sch Technol, Campus Univ, BR-88040900 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Europe; Fuzzy Delphi method; Hong Kong; India; Malaysia; smart cities; smart city policy; smart urbanization; urban policy; policy evaluation; DELPHI METHOD; CITIES; LESSONS; GOVERNANCE; ENGAGEMENT; INNOVATION; QUALITY; VALUES; PLACE;
D O I
10.3390/su13179559
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Whilst a plethora of research exists on the smart cities and project performance evaluations, only few studies have focused on the smart city policy evaluation from the perspective of its acceptance by practitioners. This paper aims to generate insights by evaluating the smart city policy through a developing country case study-i.e., Malaysia. This study employed a questionnaire survey method for data collection and analyzed the data by using Fuzzy Delphi analysis. A group of 40 practitioners was gathered in a focus group discussion through purposive sampling. The main objectives of this survey were to identify the understanding and acceptance levels of the seven smart city domains and respective strategies that are outlined in the Malaysian Smart City Framework. The results disclosed that the practitioners possessed divergent levels of understanding and acceptance in terms of smart city domains. The study participant practitioners accepted all understanding and acceptance objectives of smart economy, living, people, and governance domains (expert agreement 75-92% and threshold d value 0.123-0.188), but rejected all objectives for both smart environment and digital infrastructure domains (expert agreement 55-74% and threshold d value 0.150-0.212). Along with this, acceptance of smart mobility was also rejected (expert agreement 56% and threshold d value 0.245). The findings reveal that considering all opinions expressing dissensus is essential when building more inclusive smart city strategies. This study contributes to the smart city discourse as being one of the first in capturing professional practitioners' understanding and acceptance on a national level smart city policy by applying the Delphi method in the smart city context. Most importantly, the study informs urban policymakers on how to capture the voices and perspectives of the general public on national and local smart city strategy and initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 138 条
  • [1] Abdullah M.Y.H., 2010, J MELAYU, V5, P71
  • [2] Adnan Y.M., 2016, Planning Malaysia Journal, V14, P13
  • [3] A fuzzy synthetic evaluation of the challenges of smart city development in developing countries
    Aghimien, Douglas Omoregie
    Aigbavboa, Clinton
    Edwards, David J.
    Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed
    Olomolaiye, Paul
    Nash, Hazel
    Onyia, Michael
    [J]. SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 11 (03) : 405 - 421
  • [4] Alias W.N.H.W., BAS AWAM PUTRAJAYA T
  • [5] A hybrid SEM-neural network method for identifying acceptance factors of the smart meters in Malaysia: Challenges perspective
    Alkawsi, Gamal Abdulnaser
    Ali, Norashikin
    Mustafa, Abdulsalam Salihu
    Baashar, Yahia
    Alhussian, Hitham
    Alkahtani, Ammar
    Tiong, Sieh Kiong
    Ekanayake, Janaka
    [J]. ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 60 (01) : 227 - 240
  • [6] Alonso R G., 2016, Smarter as the new Urban Agenda p, P333, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_18, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_18]
  • [7] [Anonymous], Hong Kong Smart City Blueprint: Smart Government Initiatives
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2011, Built Environment, DOI DOI 10.2148/BENV.37.3.260
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2009, IBM I BUS VALUE
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2015, Smart Urbanism