The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity

被引:31
作者
Bridwell, Keith H. [1 ]
Berven, Sigurd [1 ]
Edwards, Charles [1 ]
Glassman, Steven [1 ]
Hamill, Christopher [1 ]
Schwab, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp 1, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
adult scoliosis; SRS-22; outcomes analysis;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453e22
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Assessment of peer-reviewed literature and personal experience with publications and grant organization. Objective. This is an analysis of the current status of evidence-based medicine for primary adult spinal deformity to answer the question of whether surgical treatment benefits patients. Summary of Background Data. A limited number of evidence-based studies have been performed for primary adult scoliosis and spinal deformity surgery. None of these studies is ideal. Methods. This is an assessment of current literature and study group methodology in an attempt to provide an evidence-based medicine approach for the study of primary presentation adult scoliosis and related spinal deformity. Results. Many reasonable studies exist; however, there are no current definitive studies that answer the question posed above. There are many obstacles, both financial and organizational, to producing an "ideal" study. Most smaller studies suggest that surgical treatment of primary adult scoliosis benefits the patient. However, there is no multicenter prospective randomized study to answer this question. Conclusion. A multicenter funded study is needed to answer appropriate questions.
引用
收藏
页码:S135 / S139
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire - Responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment [J].
Asher, M ;
Lai, SM ;
Burton, D ;
Manna, B .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (01) :70-73
[2]   A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. [J].
Benson, K ;
Hartz, AJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (25) :1878-1886
[3]   Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: Validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity [J].
Berven, S ;
Deviren, V ;
Demir-Deviren, S ;
Hu, SS ;
Bradford, DS .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (18) :2164-2169
[4]  
BERVEN SH, 2005, SRS 40 ANN M MIAM FL
[5]   Adult scoliosis: Surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes [J].
Bradford, DS ;
Tay, BKB ;
Hu, SS .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (24) :2617-2629
[6]   The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12 - A study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability [J].
Bridwell, KH ;
Cats-Baril, W ;
Harrast, J ;
Berven, S ;
Glassman, S ;
Farcy, JP ;
Horton, WC ;
Lenke, LG ;
Baldus, C ;
Radake, T .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (04) :455-461
[7]  
BRIDWELL KH, IN PRESS SPINE
[8]   RESULTS OF OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS IN ADULTS [J].
DICKSON, JH ;
MIRKOVIC, S ;
NOBLE, PC ;
NALTY, T ;
ERWIN, WD .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1995, 77A (04) :513-523
[9]   Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity [J].
Glassman, SD ;
Berven, S ;
Kostuik, J ;
Dimar, JR ;
Horton, WC ;
Bridwell, K .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (08) :941-947
[10]   The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity [J].
Glassman, SD ;
Bridwell, K ;
Dimar, JR ;
Horton, W ;
Berven, S ;
Schwab, F .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (18) :2024-2029