Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning

被引:295
作者
Fiorino, C
Reni, M
Bolognesi, A
Cattaneo, GM
Calandrino, R
机构
[1] Hosp San Raffaele, Serv Fis Sanit, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Hosp San Raffaele, Serv Radiochemioterapia, I-20132 Milan, Italy
关键词
conformal radiotherapy; prostate cancer; intra-observer variability; inter-observer variability;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(98)00021-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a fundamental prerequisite for successful conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate intra-and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate (P) and seminal vesicles (SV) and its impact on conformal treatment planning in our working conditions. Materials and methods: Inter-observer variability was investigated by asking five well-trained radiotherapists of contouring on CT images the P and the SV of six supine-positioned patients previously treated with conformal techniques. Short-term intra-observer variability was assessed by asking the radiotherapists to contour the P and SV of one patient for a second time, just after the first contouring. The differences among the inserted volumes were considered for both intra-and inter-observer variability. Regarding intra-observer variability, the differences between the two inserted contours were estimated by taking the relative differences in correspondence to the CT slices on BEV plots (antero-posterior and left-right beams). Concerning inter-observer variability, the distances between the internal and external envelopes of the inserted contours (named projected diagnostic uncertainties or PDUs) and the distances from the mean inserted contours (named mean contour distances or MCDs) were measured from BEV plots (i.e. parallel to the CT slices). Results: Intra-observer variability was relatively small (the average percentage variation of the volume was similar to 5%; SD of the differences measured on BEV plots within 1.8 mm). Concerning inter-observer variability, the percentage SD of the inserted volumes ranged from 10 to 18%. Differences equal to 1 cm in the cranio-caudal extension of P + SV were found in four out of six patients. The largest interobserver variability was found when considering the anterior margin in the left-right beam of P top (MCD = 7.1 mm, 1 SD). Relatively high values for MCDs were also found for P bottom, for the posterior and lateral margins of P top (2.6 and 3.1 mm, respectively, 1 SD) and for the anterior margin of SV (2.8 mm, 1 SD). Relatively small values were found for P central (from 1.4 to 2.0 mm, 1 SD) and the posterior margin of SV (1.5 mm, 1 SD). Conclusions: The application of larger margins taking inter-observer variability into account should be taken into consideration for the anterior and the lateral margins of SV and P top and for the lateral margin of P. The impact of short-term intra-observer variability does not seem to be relevant. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] LOCALIZATION OF THE PROSTATIC APEX FOR RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING
    ALGAN, O
    HANKS, GE
    SHAER, AH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (04): : 925 - 930
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1993, 50 ICRU
  • [3] Three dimensional planning target volumes: A model and a software tool
    AustinSeymour, M
    Kalet, I
    McDonald, J
    KromhoutSchiro, S
    Jacky, J
    Hummel, S
    Unger, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05): : 1073 - 1080
  • [4] Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy
    Bel, A
    vanHerk, M
    Lebesque, JV
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (09) : 1537 - 1545
  • [5] MAXIMIZING SETUP ACCURACY USING PORTAL IMAGES AS APPLIED TO A CONFORMAL BOOST TECHNIQUE FOR PROSTATIC-CANCER
    BIJHOLD, J
    LEBESQUE, JV
    HART, AAM
    VIJLBRIEF, RE
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 24 (04) : 261 - 271
  • [6] Cellai E, 1996, RADIOTHER ONCOL S1, V40, pS113
  • [7] PROSTATE-CANCER - COMPARISON OF RETROGRADE URETHROGRAPHY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING
    COX, JA
    ZAGORIA, RJ
    RABEN, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 29 (05): : 1119 - 1123
  • [8] DISCHE S, 1994, RADIOTHER ONCOL S1, V32, pS117
  • [9] CONTOURING STRUCTURES FOR 3-DIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING
    DOWSETT, RJ
    GALVIN, JM
    CHENG, E
    SMITH, R
    EPPERSON, R
    HARRIS, R
    HENZE, G
    NEEDHAM, M
    PAYNE, R
    PETERSON, MA
    SKINNER, AL
    REYNOLDS, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 22 (05): : 1083 - 1088
  • [10] Comparing 3-, 4- and 6-fields techniques for conformal irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles using dose-volume histograms
    Fiorino, C
    Reni, M
    Cattaneo, GM
    Bolognesi, A
    Calandrino, R
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 44 (03) : 251 - 257