Differential utilization of binding loop flexibility in T cell receptor ligand selection and cross-reactivity

被引:19
|
作者
Ayres, Cory M. [1 ,2 ]
Scott, Daniel R. [1 ,3 ]
Corcelli, Steven A. [1 ]
Baker, Brian M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Chem & Biochem, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Harper Canc Res Inst, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] NIST, Neutron Condensed Matter Grp, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2016年 / 6卷
关键词
MHC CLASS-II; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; PEPTIDE-MHC; SELF-PEPTIDE; ALPHA-BETA; RECOGNITION; AMBER; SPECIFICITY; THERMODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1038/srep25070
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Complementarity determining region (CDR) loop flexibility has been suggested to play an important role in the selection and binding of ligands by T cell receptors (TCRs) of the cellular immune system. However, questions remain regarding the role of loop motion in TCR binding, and crystallographic structures have raised questions about the extent to which generalizations can be made. Here we studied the flexibility of two structurally well characterized alpha beta TCRs, A6 and DMF5. We found that the two receptors utilize loop motion very differently in ligand binding and cross-reactivity. While the loops of A6 move rapidly in an uncorrelated fashion, those of DMF5 are substantially less mobile. Accordingly, the mechanisms of binding and cross-reactivity are very different between the two TCRs: whereas A6 relies on conformational selection to select and bind different ligands, DMF5 uses a more rigid, permissive architecture with greater reliance on slower motions or induced-fit. In addition to binding site flexibility, we also explored whether ligand-binding resulted in common dynamical changes in A6 and DMF5 that could contribute to TCR triggering. Although binding-linked motional changes propagated throughout both receptors, no common features were observed, suggesting that changes in nanosecond-level TCR structural dynamics do not contribute to T cell signaling.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Disparate Degrees of Hypervariable Loop Flexibility Control T-Cell Receptor Cross-Reactivity, Specificity, and Binding Mechanism
    Scott, Daniel R.
    Borbulevych, Oleg Y.
    Piepenbrink, Kurt H.
    Corcelli, Steven A.
    Baker, Brian M.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2011, 414 (03) : 385 - 400
  • [2] Hotspot autoimmune T cell receptor binding underlies pathogen and insulin peptide cross-reactivity
    Cole, David K.
    Bulek, Anna M.
    Dolton, Garry
    Schauenberg, Andrea J.
    Szomolay, Barbara
    Rittase, William
    Trimby, Andrew
    Jothikumar, Prithiviraj
    Fuller, Anna
    Skowera, Ania
    Rossjohn, Jamie
    Zhu, Cheng
    Miles, John J.
    Peakman, Mark
    Wooldridge, Linda
    Rizkallah, Pierre J.
    Sewell, Andrew K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2016, 126 (06): : 2191 - 2204
  • [3] Structural and dynamic control of T-cell receptor specificity, cross-reactivity, and binding mechanism
    Baker, Brian M.
    Scott, Daniel R.
    Blevins, Sydney J.
    Hawse, William F.
    IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2012, 250 : 10 - 31
  • [4] Dynamical footprint of cross-reactivity in a human autoimmune T-cell receptor
    Kumar, Amit
    Delogu, Francesco
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [5] T cell receptor cross-reactivity expanded by dramatic peptide-MHC adaptability
    Riley, Timothy P.
    Hellman, Lance M.
    Gee, Marvin H.
    Mendoza, Juan L.
    Alonso, Jesus A.
    Foley, Kendra C.
    Nishimura, Michael I.
    Vander Kooi, Craig W.
    Garcia, K. Christopher
    Baker, Brian M.
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 934 - +
  • [6] T Cell Receptor Cross-reactivity Directed by Antigen-Dependent Tuning of Peptide-MHC Molecular Flexibility
    Borbulevych, Oleg Y.
    Piepenbrink, Kurt H.
    Gloor, Brian E.
    Scott, Daniel R.
    Sommese, Ruth F.
    Cole, David K.
    Sewell, Andrew K.
    Baker, Brian M.
    IMMUNITY, 2009, 31 (06) : 885 - 896
  • [7] Quantitating T Cell Cross-Reactivity for Unrelated Peptide Antigens
    Ishizuka, Jeffrey
    Grebe, Kristie
    Shenderov, Eugene
    Peters, Bjoern
    Chen, Qiongyu
    Peng, YanChun
    Wang, Lili
    Dong, Tao
    Pasquetto, Valerie
    Oseroff, Carla
    Sidney, John
    Hickman, Heather
    Cerundolo, Vincenzo
    Sette, Alessandro
    Bennink, Jack R.
    McMichael, Andrew
    Yewdell, Jonathan W.
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 183 (07): : 4337 - 4345
  • [8] Improved structural method for T-cell cross-reactivity prediction
    Mendes, Marcus F. A.
    Antunes, Dinler A.
    Rigo, Mauricio M.
    Sinigaglia, Marialva
    Vieira, Gustavo F.
    MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 67 (02) : 303 - 310
  • [9] Stress-testing the relationship between T cell receptor/peptide-MHC affinity and cross-reactivity using peptide velcro
    Gee, Marvin H.
    Sibener, Leah V.
    Birnbaum, Michael E.
    Jude, Kevin M.
    Yang, Xinbo
    Fernandes, Ricardo A.
    Mendoza, Juan L.
    Glassman, Caleb R.
    Garcia, K. Christopher
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (31) : E7369 - E7378
  • [10] αβT cell receptor germline CDR regions moderate contact with MHC ligands and regulate peptide cross-reactivity
    Attaf, Meriem
    Holland, Stephan J.
    Bartok, Istvan
    Dyson, Julian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6