Literacy Acquisition Trajectories in Bilingual Language Minority Children and Monolingual Peers with Similar or Different SES: A Three-Year Longitudinal Study

被引:12
作者
Bonifacci, Paola [1 ]
Ferrara, Ida Carmen [2 ]
Pedrinazzi, Jessica [2 ]
Terracina, Francesco [2 ]
Palladino, Paola [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Psychol, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Pavia, Dept Brain & Behav Sci, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Foggia, Dept Humanities, Learning Sci Hub, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
关键词
bilingualism; reading; spelling; reading comprehension; listening comprehension; language minority bilingual children; READING-COMPREHENSION; FOREIGN-LANGUAGE; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; SIMPLE VIEW; ENGLISH; SKILLS; LEARNERS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; DYSLEXIA;
D O I
10.3390/brainsci12050563
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Bilingualism and socio-economic status (SES) differentially affect linguistic and cognitive development. However, less evidence has been collected regarding their impact on literacy trajectories. The present longitudinal study evaluated the literacy development of language minority bilingual children (LMBC) and monolingual peers with different SES. A group of LMBC with low-SES (n = 18) and monolingual peers with low (n = 18) or high (n = 14) SES were followed from 2nd to 5th grade through a set of tasks assessing decoding (words, nonwords, passage), reading, and listening comprehension, and spelling skills. The results showed that all groups achieved better performances over time in all measures, except listening comprehension. However, low-SES LMBC underperformed in spelling tasks compared to the monolingual groups. In reading comprehension, there was a time*group interaction that showed how low-SES LMBC reached similar performances of low-SES monolinguals in fifth grade, but both groups underperformed compared to the high SES monolingual group. The discussion is focused on the need for research and educational settings to consider the differential impact of bilingualism and SES. Bilingualism seems to be associated with a longer time in developing adequate spelling skills, whereas SES was the primary underpinning of the reading comprehension gap over time.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据