共 122 条
Flash-flood potential index estimation using fuzzy logic combined with deep learning neural network, naive Bayes, XGBoost and classification and regression tree
被引:48
作者:
Costache, Romulus
[1
]
Arabameri, Alireza
[2
]
Moayedi, Hossein
[3
,4
]
Quoc Bao Pham
[5
]
Santosh, M.
[6
,7
]
Hoang Nguyen
[8
,9
]
Pandey, Manish
[10
,11
]
Binh Thai Pham
[12
]
机构:
[1] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Civil Engn, Brasov, Romania
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Geomorphol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang, Vietnam
[5] Thu Dau Mot Univ, Inst Appl Technol, Thu Dau Mot, Vietnam
[6] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Earth Sci & Resources, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Adelaide, Dept Earth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[8] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Min Fac, Dept Surface Min, Hanoi, Vietnam
[9] Hanoi Univ Min & Geol, Ctr Min, Electromech Res, Hanoi, Vietnam
[10] Chandigarh Univ, Univ Ctr Res & Dev UCRD, Mohali, India
[11] Chandigarh Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Mohali, India
[12] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词:
Flash-flood potential index;
machine learning;
fuzzy logic;
ensemble models;
Romania;
LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT;
ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH;
EVIDENTIAL BELIEF FUNCTION;
LOGISTIC-REGRESSION;
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT;
SPATIAL PREDICTION;
RIVER CATCHMENT;
HIERARCHY PROCESS;
INFERENCE SYSTEM;
DECISION-MAKING;
D O I:
10.1080/10106049.2021.1948109
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Flash floods pose a major challenge in various regions of the world, causing serious damage to life and property. Here we investigated the Izvorul Dorului river basin from Romania, to identify slope surfaces with a high potential for flash-flood employing a combination of fuzzy logic algorithm with the following four machine learning models: classification and regression tree, deep learning neural network, XGBoost and naive Bayes. Ten flash-flood predictors were used as independent variables to determine the flash-flood potential index. As a dependent variable, we used areas with ttorrential phenomena divided into training (70%) and validating data set (30%). Predictive ability and the degree of correlation between factors were assessed through the correlation-based feature selection (CFS) method and through the confusion matrix, respectively. In the training phase, all ensemble models yielded good and very good accuracies of over 84%. The spatialization of flash-flood potential index (FFPI) over the study area showed that high and very high values of flash-flood potential occur in the northern half of the region and occupy the following weights within the study area: 53.11% (FFPI Fuzzy-CART), 45.09% (Fuzzy-DLNN), 45.58% (Fuzzy-NB) and 44.85% (Fuzzy-XGBoost). The validation of the results was done through the ROC curve method. Thus, according to success rate, Fuzzy-XGBoost (AUC = 0.886) is the best model, while in terms of prediction rate, the ideal one is Fuzzy-DLNN (AUC = 0.84). The novelty of this work is the application of the four ensemble models in evaluating this natural hazard.
引用
收藏
页码:6780 / 6807
页数:28
相关论文