Food Literacy Evaluation Questionnaire (Chinese version, FLEQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation

被引:5
|
作者
Qian, Weiwei [1 ]
Jiang, Qing [2 ]
Wang, Hao [3 ]
Chen, Jing [1 ]
Ju, Yang [4 ]
Wang, Xiaohua [4 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Clin Med Coll, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Endocrinol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Yangzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll, Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nursing Dept, Shizi St, Suzhou 215006, Peoples R China
关键词
food literacy; cross-culture; reliability; validity; RELIABILITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1111/phn.13118
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To conduct a Food Literacy Evaluation Questionnaire Chinese Version (FLEQ-Ch) through a cross-cultural validation of the original questionnaire. Design This was an observational, cross-sectional study undertaken in two phases: (1) translation and cross-culture adaptation, and (2) psychometric evaluation. Sample A total of 509 residents in Yangzhou City, China were enrolled in this study. Methods A translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FLEQ in Chinese was developed. The psychometric characteristics of FLEQ-Ch were analyzed for internal consistency, content validity, construct validity and discriminant validity. Results The KMO value of the questionnaire was 0.901 and the approximate chi-square value of Bartlett's sphericity test was 8132.538. The ranges of the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the test-retest coefficient of the total questionnaire and three dimensions were 0.869-0.955 and 0.941-0.952, respectively. The value of content validity index of the total questionnaire was 0.945. Construct validity: (1) Aggregation coefficient was between 0.828 and 0.955; (2) Discrimination coefficient was between 0.004 and 0.227; (3) Correlation coefficient between each factor was between 0.046 and 0.188; the correlation coefficient between each factor and the total questionnaire ranged from 0.419 to 0.788. Discriminant validity: the standardized factor loadings of all items on the corresponding factors were 0.75-0.96. The results of the model-fit indices showed RMSEA was 0.08 and GFI was 0.91. Conclusions The FLEQ-Ch can effectively evaluate the food literacy of the general public in terms of foods planning and management, foods selection, and foods-making attitudes. It covers the four areas of food literacy, and shows good practicability and operability.
引用
收藏
页码:1386 / 1394
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
    Pei, L. B.
    Xia, J. J.
    Yan, J. L.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (06) : 1985 - 1996
  • [2] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Brace Questionnaire
    Yi, Honglei
    Chen, Hu
    Wang, Xinhui
    Xia, Hong
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 9
  • [3] Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation
    Ruiz-Munoz, Maria
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
    Li, Guang Zhi
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio, I
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (01) : 104 - 111
  • [4] Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire
    Gunaydin, Gurkan
    Citaker, Seyit
    Meray, Jale
    Cobanoglu, Gamze
    Gunaydin, Ozge Ece
    Kanik, Zeynep Hazar
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (21) : E1292 - E1297
  • [5] Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score
    James Reeves Mbori Ngwayi
    Jie Tan
    Ning Liang
    Emmanuel Gildas Eric Sita
    Daniel Edward Porter
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [6] Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score
    Ngwayi, James Reeves Mbori
    Tan, Jie
    Liang, Ning
    Sita, Emmanuel Gildas Eric
    Porter, Daniel Edward
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [7] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Danish version of the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire
    Nikolaj Agger
    Thor Andre Brøndberg Stæhr
    Michael Skovdal Rathleff
    Lene Baad-Hansen
    Shellie Boudreau
    David Høyrup Christiansen
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 9 (1)
  • [8] Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of a Chinese version of the swallowing impairment score
    Xu, Weiwei
    Zhou, Yuqiu
    Fan, Yuxia
    Jiang, Man
    Li, Guihua
    Guo, Hui
    Yang, Qing
    Zeng, Dingfen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [9] Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of Malay Version Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire
    Abdullah, Anwar
    Daud, Ahmad Zamir Che
    Dahlan, Akehsan
    Muhammad, Rashdeen Fazwi
    ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL, 2019, 4 (12): : 149 - 156
  • [10] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Persian version of Fremantle Knee Awareness Questionnaire
    Hedayati, Rozita
    Amjadian, Farnaz
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Ehsani, Fatemeh
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2022, 29 : 257 - 263