Vaginal danazol for women with rectovaginal endometriosis and pain symptoms persisting after insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device

被引:30
作者
Ferrero, Simone [1 ,2 ]
Tramalloni, Daniela
Venturini, Pier Luigi
Remorgida, Valentino
机构
[1] San Martino Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
关键词
Danazol; Endometriosis; Intrauterine device; Levonorgestrel; Rectovaginal endometriosis; ADMINISTERED PROGESTOGEN LEVONORGESTREL; WATER-CONTRAST; PELVIC PAIN; DIAGNOSIS; EFFICACY; THERAPY; RECTUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with vaginal danazol in improving the pain symptoms caused by rectovaginal endometriosis that persist after insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD). Methods: This pilot observational study included 15 women with rectovaginal endometriosis and pain symptoms persisting after LNG-IUD insertion. Vaginal danazol (100 mg per day) was self-administered for 6 months. The intensity of pain symptoms and the volume of rectovaginal endometriotic nodules were evaluated. Results: Twelve women were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment. After treatment with vaginal danazol for 3 months, there was a significant decrease in the intensity of pain symptoms compared with their intensity before the administration of danazol. The intensity of pain symptoms decreased further at 6-month follow-up. The volume of the rectovaginal nodules decreased after treatment with vaginal danazol for 6 months (1.7 +/- 0.8 cm(3)) compared with the baseline volume (2.3 +/- 0.9cm(3); P<0.001). Adverse effects of the treatment were minimal and well tolerated. Conclusion: Although a placebo effect cannot be excluded, the results indicate that vaginal danazol decreases the severity of endometriosis-related pain symptoms after LNG-IUD insertion. (C) 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 119
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgery
    Abou-Setta, A. M.
    Al-Inany, H. G.
    Farquhar, C. M.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):
  • [2] Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
    不详
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 : S260 - S269
  • [3] DOSAGE ASPECTS OF DANAZOL THERAPY IN ENDOMETRIOSIS - SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS
    BIBEROGLU, KO
    BEHRMAN, SJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1981, 139 (06) : 645 - 654
  • [4] BUTTRAM VC, 1985, FERTIL STERIL, V43, P353
  • [5] ESILVA ACD, 2006, FERTIL STERIL, V86, P742
  • [6] Use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis
    Fedele, L
    Bianchi, S
    Zanconato, G
    Portuese, A
    Raffaelli, R
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (03) : 485 - 488
  • [7] Effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on cardiovascular risk markers in patients with endometriosis: a comparative study with the GnRH analogue
    Ferreira, Rodrigo Alves
    Vieira, Carolina Sales
    Rosa-e-Silva, Julio Cesar
    Sa Rosa-e-Silva, Ana Carolina J.
    Nogueira, Antonio A.
    Ferriani, Rui A.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [8] Current pharmacotherapy for endometriosis
    Ferrero, Simone
    Remorgida, Valentino
    Venturini, Pier Luigi
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 11 (07) : 1123 - 1134
  • [9] Novel vaginal danazol ring therapy for pelvic endometriosis, in particular deeply infiltrating endometriosis
    Igarashi, M
    Iizuka, M
    Abe, Y
    Ibuki, Y
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (07) : 1952 - 1956
  • [10] The efficacy, side-effects and continuation rates in women with symptomatic endometriosis undergoing treatment with an intra-uterine administered progestogen (levonorgestrel): a 3 year follow-up
    Lockhat, FB
    Emembolu, JO
    Konje, JC
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) : 789 - 793