The roles of disgust sensitivity and anxiety sensitivity in attentional bias in dental anxiety

被引:5
作者
Stevens, Elizabeth S. [1 ,4 ]
Behar, Evelyn [2 ]
Siev, Jedidiah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL USA
[2] CUNY, Hunter Coll, Dept Psychol, New York, NY USA
[3] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Psychol, Swarthmore, PA USA
[4] Seattle Div, VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Dental phobia; Disgust sensitivity; Anxiety sensitivity; Attentional bias; Avoidance; BLOOD-INJECTION-INJURY; DSM-IV ANXIETY; MOOD DISORDERS; PANIC DISORDER; THREAT; PHOBIA; FEAR; AVOIDANCE; PAIN; DISENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102450
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Individuals with dental anxiety show biased attentional processing of threat- and dental-related information. Disgust sensitivity and anxiety sensitivity are both associated with dental fears and attentional biases. Whereas disgust sensitivity is generally associated with attentional avoidance (Armstrong et al., 2014), anxiety sensitivity may be associated with attentional engagement (Keogh et al., 2001a). Elucidating the role of these constructs in dental anxiety-relevant attentional biases could inform theoretical models and/or intervention recommendations. Participants (N = 51) with high dental anxiety completed a Posner paradigm to assess attentional biases to dental versus neutral stimuli. We examined whether disgust sensitivity and anxiety sensitivity moderated degree of attentional bias. Results indicated that both disgust sensitivity (mutilation subscale) and anxiety sensitivity (physical concerns subscale) statistically moderated degree of attentional bias at trend level, and in opposite directions. Simple effects analyses further indicated that disgust sensitivity regarding mutilation was associated with less attentional bias toward dental relative to neutral stimuli, potentially indicating attentional avoidance, and remained so when adjusting for anxiety sensitivity. In contrast, simple effects analysis indicated that anxiety sensitivity regarding physical concerns was not associated with magnitude of attentional bias. If replicated, findings highlight the potential role of disgust in dental anxiety.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [21] Blood-injury-injection phobia and dental phobia
    De Jongh, A
    Bongaarts, G
    Vermeule, I
    Visser, K
    De Vos, P
    Makkes, P
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1998, 36 (10) : 971 - 982
  • [22] Shaking That lcky Feeling: Effects of Extinction and Counterconditioning on Disgust-Related Evaluative Learning
    Engelhard, Iris M.
    Leer, Arne
    Lange, Emma
    Olatunji, Bunmi O.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2014, 45 (05) : 708 - 719
  • [23] The Assessment of Reliability Under Range Restriction: A Comparison of α, ω, and Test-Retest Reliability for Dichotomous Data
    Fife, Dustin A.
    Mendoza, Jorge L.
    Terry, Robert
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2012, 72 (05) : 862 - 888
  • [24] Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?
    Fox, E
    Russo, R
    Bowles, R
    Dutton, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (04) : 681 - 700
  • [25] Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias
    Fredrikson, M
    Annas, P
    Fischer, H
    Wik, G
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1996, 34 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [26] A critical review of approaches to the treatment of dental anxiety in adults
    Gordon, Dina
    Heimberg, Richard G.
    Tellez, Marisol
    Ismail, Amid I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2013, 27 (04) : 365 - 378
  • [27] Enhanced probing of attentional bias: The independence of anxiety-linked selectivity in attentional engagement with and disengagement from negative information
    Grafton, Ben
    MacLeod, Colin
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2014, 28 (07) : 1287 - 1302
  • [28] HABITUATION DURING EXPOSURE TREATMENT - DISTRACTION VS ATTENTION-FOCUSING
    GRAYSON, JB
    FOA, EB
    STEKETEE, G
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1982, 20 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [29] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN SENSITIVITY TO DISGUST - A SCALE SAMPLING 7 DOMAINS OF DISGUST ELICITORS
    HAIDT, J
    MCCAULEY, C
    ROZIN, P
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1994, 16 (05) : 701 - 713
  • [30] Humphris G M, 1995, Community Dent Health, V12, P143