Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer

被引:7
作者
Kim, Hyun-Ki [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Jin [3 ]
Lee, Young-Jae [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Kim, Jisun [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Kim, Yongsub [6 ]
Kim, Kyunggon [6 ]
Lee, Shin-Wha [2 ,4 ]
Chang, Suhwan [6 ]
Lee, Young Joo [2 ,5 ]
Lee, Jong Won [2 ,5 ]
Lee, Woochang [1 ,2 ]
Chun, Sail [1 ,2 ]
Son, Byung Ho [2 ,5 ]
Jung, Kyung Hae [2 ,7 ]
Kim, Yong-Man [2 ,4 ]
Min, Won-Ki [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Sei-Hyun [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Hallym Univ, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, Hwaseong, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Univ Ulsan, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Inst Convergence Sci & Technol, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
MISSENSE VARIANTS; UNCERTAIN SIGNIFICANCE; SEQUENCE VARIANTS; CLASSIFICATION; MUTATIONS; RISK; MANAGEMENT; GENETICS; DOMAIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s10038-019-0713-2
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The clinical utility of BRCA1/2 genotyping was recently extended from the selection of subjects at high risk for hereditary breast and ovary cancer to the identification of candidates for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. This underscores the importance of accurate interpretation of BRCA1/2 genetic variants and of reducing the number of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). Two recent studies by Findlay et al. and Starita et al. introduced high-throughput functional assays, and proactively analyzed variants in specific regions regardless of whether they had been previously observed. We retrospectively reviewed all BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports from patients with breast or ovarian cancer examined at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between September 2011 and December 2018. Variants were assigned pathogenic or benign strong evidence codes according to the functional classification and were reclassified according to the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines. Among 3684 patients with available BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline genetic test reports, 429 unique variants (181 from BRCA1) were identified. Of 34 BRCA1 variants intersecting with the data reported by Findlay et al., three missense single-nucleotide variants from four patients (0.11%, 4/3684) were reclassified from VUSs to likely pathogenic variants. Four variants scored as functional were reclassified into benign or likely benign variants. Three variants that overlapped with the data reported by Starita et al. could not be reclassified. In conclusion, proactive high-throughput functional study data are useful for the reclassification of clinically observed VUSs. Integrating additional evidence, including functional assay results, may help reduce the number of VUSs.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations
    Adzhubei, Ivan A.
    Schmidt, Steffen
    Peshkin, Leonid
    Ramensky, Vasily E.
    Gerasimova, Anna
    Bork, Peer
    Kondrashov, Alexey S.
    Sunyaev, Shamil R.
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (04) : 248 - 249
  • [2] The ACMG/AMP reputable source criteria for the interpretation of sequence variants
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    Harrison, Steven M.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 20 (12) : 1687 - 1688
  • [3] A High-Throughput Functional Complementation Assay for Classification of BRCA1 Missense Variants
    Bouwman, Peter
    van der Gulden, Hanneke
    van der Heijden, Ingrid
    Drost, Rinske
    Klijn, Christiaan N.
    Prasetyanti, Pramudita
    Pieterse, Mark
    Wientjens, Ellen
    Seibler, Jost
    Hogervorst, Frans B. L.
    Jonkers, Jos
    [J]. CANCER DISCOVERY, 2013, 3 (10) : 1142 - 1155
  • [4] Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework
    Brnich, Sarah E.
    Abou Tayoun, Ahmad N.
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Cutting, Garry R.
    Greenblatt, Marc S.
    Heinen, Christopher D.
    Kanavy, Dona M.
    Luo, Xi
    McNulty, Shannon M.
    Starita, Lea M.
    Tavtigian, Sean, V
    Wright, Matt W.
    Harrison, Steven M.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Brenner, Steven E.
    Ellard, Sian
    Karbassi, Izabela
    Karchin, Rachel
    Mester, Jessica L.
    O'Donnell-Luria, Anne
    Pesaran, Tina
    Plon, Sharon E.
    Rehm, Heidi
    Topper, Scott
    [J]. GENOME MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [5] Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks
    Brnich, Sarah E.
    Rivera-Munoz, Edgar A.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    [J]. HUMAN MUTATION, 2018, 39 (11) : 1531 - 1541
  • [6] BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2
    Cline, Melissa S.
    Liao, Rachel G.
    Parsons, Michael T.
    Paten, Benedict
    Alquaddoomi, Faisal
    Antoniou, Antonis
    Baxter, Samantha
    Brody, Larry
    Cook-Deegan, Robert
    Coffin, Amy
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Craft, Brian
    Currie, Robert
    Dlott, Chloe C.
    Dolman, Lena
    den Dunnen, Johan T.
    Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Easton, Douglas
    Fischmann, Zachary
    Foulkes, William D.
    Garber, Judy
    Goldgar, David
    Goldman, Mary J.
    Goodhand, Peter
    Harrison, Steven
    Haussler, David
    Kato, Kazuto
    Knoppers, Bartha
    Markello, Charles
    Nussbaum, Robert
    Offit, Kenneth
    Plon, Sharon E.
    Rashbass, Jem
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Robson, Mark
    Rubinstein, Wendy S.
    Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
    Tavtigian, Sean
    Thorogood, Adrian
    Zhang, Can
    Zimmermann, Marc
    Burn, John
    Chanock, Stephen
    Ratsch, Gunnar
    Spurdle, Amanda B.
    Andreoletti, Gaia
    Baker, Dixie
    Brenner, Steven
    Brush, Matthew
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2018, 14 (12):
  • [7] NCCN Guidelines® Insights Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2017 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Daly, Mary B.
    Pilarski, Robert
    Berry, Michael
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Farmer, Meagan
    Friedman, Susan
    Garber, Judy E.
    Kauff, Noah D.
    Khan, Seema
    Klein, Catherine
    Kohlmann, Wendy
    Kurian, Allison
    Litton, Jennifer K.
    Madlensky, Lisa
    Merajver, Sofia D.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Pal, Tuya
    Reiser, Gwen
    Shannon, Kristen Mahoney
    Swisher, Elizabeth
    Vinayak, Shaveta
    Voian, Nicoleta C.
    Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
    Wick, Myra J.
    Wiesner, Georgia L.
    Dwyer, Mary
    Darlow, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2017, 15 (01): : 9 - 19
  • [8] Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals
    Desmet, Francois-Olivier
    Hamroun, Dalil
    Lalande, Marine
    Collod-Beroud, Gwenaelle
    Claustres, Mireille
    Beroud, Christophe
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (09)
  • [9] A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Deffenbaugh, Amie M.
    Pruss, Dmitry
    Frye, Cynthia
    Wenstrup, Richard J.
    Allen-Brady, Kristina
    Tavtigian, Sean V.
    Monteiro, Alvaro N. A.
    Iversen, Edwin S.
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Goldgar, David E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2007, 81 (05) : 873 - 883
  • [10] Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists
    Eccles, B. K.
    Copson, E.
    Maishman, T.
    Abraham, J. E.
    Eccles, D. M.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2015, 15