Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes

被引:85
作者
Daneshgari, Firouz [1 ]
Kefer, John C. [1 ]
Moore, Courtenay [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; robotic; female;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07109.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the management of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy (RASC) and evaluate outcomes using the POP quantification scale (POP-Q). Women with symptomatic stages III and IV POP were evaluated at our institution. After complete clinical assessment, including POP-Q-based physical examination and urodynamic studies, the patients underwent RASC with or without anti-incontinence surgery in the presence (sacrouteropexy) or absence of uterus (sacrocolpopexy). Follow-up examinations at 3 and 6 months included a POP-Q-based examination. Fifteen women were consented for RASC; 12 underwent successful RASC, one required conversion to laparoscopic ASC, one to open ASC, and one to transvaginal repair. The mean (range) patient age was 64 (50-79) years. Before surgery, the mean POP-Q stage was 3.1 (3-4) and the POP-Q values for the anterior (Aa, Ba), posterior (Ap, Bp) and apex (C) of the vagina were: Aa - 0.9, Ba + 1.0, Ap - 1.0, Bp + 1.3, and C +2.1. After surgery, the mean POP-Q stage was 0 and the POP-Q values had improved to Aa - 2.29, Ba - 2.29, Ap - 2.65, Bp - 2.65, and C - 8.28. The mean (range) estimated blood loss during surgery was 81 (50-150) mL. The mean hospital stay was 2.4 (1-7) days. Seven patients had concurrent placement of a mid-urethral sling and one patient had a concurrent Burch colposuspension. These early results show that RASC is safe and efficacious, and that its anatomical outcomes compare favourably to the reported results for open or laparoscopic ASC.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 879
页数:5
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation
    Benson, JT
    Lucente, V
    McClellan, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) : 1418 - 1421
  • [2] BRUBAKER L, 2005, 3 INT CONS INC, V2, P1373
  • [3] The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction
    Bump, RC
    Mattiasson, A
    Bo, K
    Brubaker, LP
    DeLancey, JOL
    Klarskov, P
    Shull, BL
    Smith, ARB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [4] Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse
    Elliott, Daniel S.
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    Chow, George K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (02) : 655 - 659
  • [5] Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A prospective randomized study
    Maher, CF
    Qatawneh, AM
    Dwyer, PL
    Carey, MP
    Cornish, A
    Schluter, PJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [6] Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence
    Olsen, AL
    Smith, VJ
    Bergstrom, JO
    Colling, JC
    Clark, AL
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) : 501 - 506