Renal Outcome of IgM Nephropathy: A Comparative Prospective Cohort Study

被引:3
作者
Chae, Yura [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Hye Eun [1 ,3 ]
Chang, Yoon Kyung [1 ,4 ]
Kim, Young Soo [1 ,5 ]
Kim, Hyung Wook [1 ,6 ]
Choi, Bum Soon [1 ,7 ]
Park, Cheol Whee [1 ,8 ]
Song, Ho Cheol [1 ,9 ]
Kim, Young Ok [1 ,5 ]
Koh, Eun Sil [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Sungjin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Yeouido St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Seoul 07345, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Incheon 22711, South Korea
[4] Catholic Univ Korea, Daejeon St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Daejeon 34943, South Korea
[5] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Uijongbu 11765, South Korea
[6] Catholic Univ Korea, St Vincents Hosp, Div Nephrol, Suwon 16247, South Korea
[7] Catholic Univ Korea, Eunpyeong St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Seoul 03476, South Korea
[8] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[9] Catholic Univ Korea, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Bucheon 14647, South Korea
关键词
IgM nephropathy; kidney biopsy; glomerulonephritis; renal outcome; prognosis; MINIMAL-CHANGE DISEASE; NEPHROTIC SYNDROME; IMMUNOGLOBULIN-M; SINGLE-CENTER; PREVALENCE; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10184191
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Immunoglobulin M nephropathy (IgMN) is an idiopathic glomerulonephritis characterized by diffuse deposits of IgM in the glomerular mesangium. However, its renal prognosis remains unknown. We compared renal outcomes of IgMN patients with those of patients with minimal change disease (MCD), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), or mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (MsPGN) from a prospective observational cohort, with 1791 patients undergoing native kidney biopsy in eight hospitals affiliated with The Catholic University of Korea between December 2014 and October 2020. IgMN had more mesangial proliferation and matrix expansion than MsPGN and more tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis than MCD. IgMN patients had decreased eGFR than MCD patients in the earlier follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in urine protein or eGFR among all patients at the last follow-up. When IgMN was divided into three subtypes, patients with FSGS-like IgMN tended to have lower eGFR than those with MCD-like or MsPGN-like IgMN but higher proteinuria than MsPGN-like IgMN without showing a significant difference. The presence of hypertension at the time of kidney biopsy predicted >= 20% decline of eGFR over two years in IgMN patients. Our data indicate that IgMN would have a clinical course and renal prognosis similar to MCD, FSGS, and MsPGN.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ahmed FA, 2019, SAUDI J KIDNEY DIS T, V30, P235
[2]   Childhood IgM nephropathy: Comparison with minimal change disease [J].
AlEisa, A ;
Carter, JE ;
Lirenman, DS ;
Magil, AB .
NEPHRON, 1996, 72 (01) :37-43
[3]   Resolution of IgM Nephropathy After Rituximab Treatment [J].
Betjes, Michiel G. H. ;
Roodnat, Joke I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2009, 53 (06) :1059-1062
[4]  
BHASIN HK, 1978, LAB INVEST, V39, P21
[5]   A critical role of natural immunoglobulin M in immediate defense against systemic bacterial infection [J].
Boes, M ;
Prodeus, AP ;
Schmidt, T ;
Carroll, MC ;
Chen, JZ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 188 (12) :2381-2386
[6]   DISTINGUISHING MINIMAL-CHANGE DISEASE FROM MESANGIAL DISORDERS [J].
BORDER, WA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1988, 34 (03) :419-434
[7]   IgM nephropathy: is it closer to minimal change disease or to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis? [J].
Brugnano, R. ;
Del Sordo, R. ;
Covarelli, C. ;
Gnappi, E. ;
Pasquali, S. .
JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 29 (04) :479-486
[8]  
Chan YH, 2000, HONG KONG J NEPHROL, V2, P23
[9]  
COHEN AH, 1978, LAB INVEST, V38, P610
[10]   The natural history of immunoglobulin M nephropathy in adults [J].
Connor, Thomas M. ;
Aiello, Valeria ;
Griffith, Megan ;
Cairns, Thomas ;
Roufosse, Candice A. ;
Cook, H. Terence ;
Pusey, Charles D. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 32 (05) :823-829