A Place-Based Approach to Agricultural Nonmaterial Intangible Cultural Ecosystem Service Values

被引:20
作者
Petway, Joy R. [1 ]
Lin, Yu-Pin [1 ]
Wunderlich, Rainer F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Bioenvironm Syst Engn, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
关键词
farmers; context-specific; local; socio-ecological production landscape; agroecosystem services; organic farming; rural; SOCIAL VALUES; RELATIONAL VALUES; SUSTAINABILITY; LANDSCAPES; INDICATORS; BEHAVIOR; MEDIA; MAP;
D O I
10.3390/su12020699
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Though agricultural landscape biodiversity and ecosystem service (ES) conservation is crucial to sustainability, agricultural land is often underrepresented in ES studies, while cultural ES associated with agricultural land is often limited to aesthetic and tourism recreation value only. This study mapped 7 nonmaterial-intangible cultural ES (NICE) valuations of 34 rural farmers in western Taiwan using the Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) methodology, to show the effect of farming practices on NICE valuations. However, rather than a direct causal relationship between the environmental characteristics that underpin ES, and respondents' ES valuations, we found that environmental data is not explanatory enough for causality within a socio-ecological production landscape where one type of land cover type (a micro mosaic of agricultural land cover) predominates. To compensate, we used a place-based approach with Google Maps data to create context-specific data to inform our assessment of NICE valuations. Based on 338 mapped points of 7 NICE valuations distributed among 6 areas within the landscape, we compared 2 groups of farmers and found that farmers' valuations about their landscape were better understood when accounting for both the landscape's cultural places and environmental characteristics, rather than environmental characteristics alone. Further, farmers' experience and knowledge influenced their NICE valuations such that farm areas were found to be sources of multiple NICE benefits demonstrating that farming practices may influence ES valuation in general.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Principal component analysis [J].
Abdi, Herve ;
Williams, Lynne J. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2010, 2 (04) :433-459
[2]   Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space [J].
Alessa, Lilian ;
Kliskey, Andrew ;
Brown, Gregory .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 85 (01) :27-39
[3]   Relational values in agroecosystem governance [J].
Allen, Karen E. ;
Quinn, Courtney E. ;
English, Chambers ;
Quinn, John E. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 35 :108-115
[4]   Trade-offs in nature tourism: contrasting parcel-level decisions with landscape conservation planning [J].
Allen, Karen E. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01)
[5]   A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling [J].
Amatulli, Giuseppe ;
Domisch, Sami ;
Tuanmu, Mao-Ning ;
Parmentier, Benoit ;
Ranipeta, Ajay ;
Malczyk, Jeremy ;
Jetz, Walter .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[7]  
[Anonymous], MIAOLI GOVT NEWS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, INT PARTN SAT IN IPS
[9]  
Baxter K, 2015, UNDERSTANDING YOUR USERS: A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO USER RESEARCH METHODS, 2ND EDITION, P1