The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception

被引:141
作者
Guest, Steve [2 ]
Dessirier, Jean Marc [1 ]
Mehrabyan, Anahit [2 ]
McGlone, Francis [3 ]
Essick, Greg [2 ]
Gescheider, George [4 ]
Fontana, Anne [5 ]
Xiong, Rui [1 ]
Ackerley, Rochelle [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Blot, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Unilever R&D, Percept & Behav, Sensat, Trumbull, CT 06611 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Ctr Neurosensory Disorders, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Nat Sci & Psychol, Liverpool L3 5UX, Merseyside, England
[4] Syracuse Univ, Inst Sensory Res, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] Behav Measurements Inc, Cazenovia, NY USA
[6] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Neurosci & Physiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Touch; Texture perception; Psychometric testing; Factor analysis; Multidimensional scaling; UNMYELINATED AFFERENTS; TACTILE ROUGHNESS; SEMANTIC SPACE; DIMENSIONS; TEXTURE; HANDLE; DISCRIMINATION; FINGERTIP; KNOWLEDGE; COMFORT;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-010-0037-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
No comprehensive language exists that describes the experience of touch. Three experiments were conducted to take steps toward establishing a touch lexicon. In Experiment I, 49 participants rated how well 262 adjectives described sensory, emotional and evaluative aspects of touch. In Experiment II, participants rated pairwise dissimilarities of the most descriptive words of the set. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) solutions representing semantic-perceptual spaces underlying the words resulted in a touch perception task (TPT) consisting of 26 'sensory' attributes (e.g., bumpiness) and 14 'emotional' attributes (e.g., pleasurable). In Experiment III, 40 participants used the TPT to rate unseen textured materials that were moved actively or received passively against the index fingerpad, volar forearm, and two underarm sites. MDS confirmed similar semantic-perceptual structures in Experiments II and III. Factor analysis of Experiment III data decomposed the sensory attribute ratings into factors labeled Roughness, Slip, Pile and Firmness, and the emotional attribute ratings into Comfort and Arousal factors. Factor scores varied among materials and sites. Greater intensity of sensory and emotional responses were reported when participants passively, as opposed to actively, received stimuli. The sensitivity of the TPT in identifying body site and mode of touch-related perceptual differences affirms the validity and utility of this novel linguistic/perceptual tool.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 550
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Bhushan N, 1997, COGNITIVE SCI, V21, P219
[2]  
BJERRING P, 1985, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, P83
[3]   Why can't you tickle yourself? [J].
Blakemore, SJ ;
Wolpert, D ;
Frith, C .
NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (11) :R11-R16
[4]   Passive, active and intra-active (self) touch [J].
Bolanowski, SJ ;
Verrillo, RT ;
McGlone, F .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 148 (1-2) :41-45
[5]  
Bolanowski SJ, 1999, SOMATOSENS MOT RES, V16, P304
[6]   Predicting the handle and comfort of military clothing fabrics from sensory and instrumental data: Development and application of new psychophysical methods [J].
Cardello, AV ;
Winterhalter, C ;
Schutz, HG .
TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2003, 73 (03) :221-237
[7]  
Carroll J.M., 1999, Review of General Psychology, V3, P14, DOI [10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.14, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.14]
[8]  
Cattell R., 2012, The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences
[9]   LIMITING RESPONSE ALTERNATIVES IN TIME-INTENSITY SCALING - AN EXAMINATION OF THE HALO-DUMPING EFFECT [J].
CLARK, CC ;
LAWLESS, HT .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 1994, 19 (06) :583-594
[10]   Psychophysical assessment of the affective components of non-painful touch [J].
Essick, GK ;
James, A ;
McGlone, FP .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (10) :2083-2087