How Polarized Are Online and Offline News Audiences? A Comparative Analysis of Twelve Countries

被引:94
作者
Fletcher, Richard [1 ]
Cornia, Alessio [1 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Reuters Inst Study Journalism, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Polit Commun, Oxford, England
[3] Dublin City Univ, Sch Commun, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
journalism; media audiences; new technologies; press systems; Western Europe; SELECTIVE EXPOSURE; MEDIA; FRAGMENTATION; HALLIN; GAPS;
D O I
10.1177/1940161219892768
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Polarization is a key area of interest for media and communication scholars. We develop a way of measuring how polarized news audience behaviour is at the national level. Then, we analyze survey data from twelve countries and find (1) that cross-platform (online and offline) news audience polarization is highest in the United States, and within Europe, higher in polarized pluralist/southern countries than in democratic corporatist countries. Furthermore, (2) in most countries, online news audience polarization is higher than offline, but in a small number it's lower. Taken together, our findings highlight that, despite the well-documented fears associated with algorithmic selection, news audience polarization is not inevitable in environments that are increasingly characterized by digital news consumption, and that the historical, economic, and political factors emphasized by the comparative tradition remain critically important for our understanding of global trends.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 195
页数:27
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Measuring Media Diet in a High-Choice Environment - Testing the List-Frequency Technique
    Andersen, Kim
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    Albaek, Erik
    [J]. COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2016, 10 (2-3) : 81 - 98
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017
  • [3] Communication, Persuasion, and the Conditioning Value of Selective Exposure: Like Minds May Unite and Divide but They Mostly Tune Out
    Arceneaux, Kevin
    Johnson, Martin
    Cryderman, John
    [J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2013, 30 (02) : 213 - 231
  • [4] Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
    Bakshy, Eytan
    Messing, Solomon
    Adamic, Lada A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) : 1130 - 1132
  • [5] Blumler Jay., 1995, CRISIS PUBLIC COMMUN
  • [6] Should we worry about filter bubbles?
    Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen
    Trilling, Damian
    Moller, Judith
    Bodo, Balazs
    de Vreese, Claes H.
    Helberger, Natali
    [J]. INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2016, 5 (01):
  • [7] Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems
    Brueggemann, Michael
    Engesser, Sven
    Buechel, Florin
    Humprecht, Edda
    Castro, Laia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 64 (06) : 1037 - 1065
  • [8] Bridging Gaps in Cross-Cutting Media Exposure: The Role of Public Service Broadcasting
    Castro-Herrero, Laia
    Nir, Lilach
    Skovsgaard, Morten
    [J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2018, 35 (04) : 542 - 565
  • [9] Policy Ideology in European Mass Publics, 1981-2016
    Caughey, Devin
    O'Grady, Tom
    Warshaw, Christopher
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (03) : 674 - 693
  • [10] The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media
    Dubois, Elizabeth
    Blank, Grant
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2018, 21 (05) : 729 - 745