Multi-criteria Decision analysis for assessment and appraisal of Orphan Drugs

被引:36
作者
Iskrov, Georgi [1 ,2 ]
Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Tsonka [1 ,2 ]
Stefanov, Rumen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Plovdiv, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Social Med & Publ Hlth, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
[2] Inst Rare Dis, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
关键词
health technology assessment; reimbursement; decision-making; multi-criteria decision analysis; orphan drugs; rare diseases; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES; RARE DISEASES; REIMBURSEMENT; CRITERIA; IMPLEMENTATION; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2016.00214
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Limited resources and expanding expectations push all countries and types of health systems to adopt new approaches in priority setting and resources allocation. Despite best efforts, it is difficult to reconcile all competing interests, and trade-offs are inevitable. This is why multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has played a major role in recent uptake of value-based reimbursement. MCDA framework enables exploration of stakeholders' preferences, as well as explicit organization of broad range of criteria on which real-world decisions are made. Assessment and appraisal of orphan drugs tend to be one of the most complicated health technology assessment (HTA) tasks. Access to market approved orphan therapies remains an issue. Early constructive dialog among rare disease stakeholders and elaboration of orphan drug-tailored decision support tools could set the scene for ongoing accumulation of evidence, as well as for proper reimbursement decision-making. Objective: The objective of this study was to create an MCDA value measurement model to assess and appraise orphan drugs. This was achieved by exploring the preferences on decision criteria's weights and performance scores through a stakeholder-representative survey and a focus group discussion that were both organized in Bulgaria. Results/conclusion: Decision criteria that describe the health technology's characteristics were unanimously agreed as the most important group of reimbursement considerations. This outcome, combined with the high individual weight of disease severity and disease burden criteria, underlined some of the fundamental principles of health care -equity and fairness. Our study proved that strength of evidence may be a key criterion in orphan drug assessment and appraisal. Evidence is used not only to shape reimbursement decision-making but also to lend legitimacy to policies pursued. The need for real-world data on orphan drugs was largely stressed. Improved knowledge on MCDA feasibility and integration to HTA is of paramount importance, as progress in medicine and innovative health technologies should correspond to patient, health-care system, and societal values.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Value-Based Assessment of New Medical Technologies: Towards a Robust Methodological Framework for the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in the Context of Health Technology Assessment [J].
Angelis, Aris ;
Kanavos, Panos .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (05) :435-446
[2]  
[Anonymous], FRONT PHARMACOL
[3]  
Council of the EU, 2009, Official Journal of the European Union, V52, P7
[4]   Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making:: How are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge? [J].
Eichler, HG ;
Kong, SX ;
Gerth, WC ;
Mavros, P ;
Jönsson, B .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (05) :518-528
[5]   A comparative study of the role of disease severity in drug reimbursement decision making in four European countries [J].
Franken, Margreet ;
Stolk, Elly ;
Scharringhausen, Tessa ;
de Boer, Anthonius ;
Koopmanschap, Marc .
HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (02) :195-202
[6]   Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements-Good Practices for Design, Implementation, and Evaluation: Report of the ISPOR Good Practices for Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements Task Force [J].
Garrison, Louis P., Jr. ;
Towse, Adrian ;
Briggs, Andrew ;
de Pouvourville, Gerard ;
Grueger, Jens ;
Mohr, Penny E. ;
Severens, J. L. ;
Siviero, Paolo ;
Sleeper, Miguel .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (05) :703-719
[7]  
Iskrov G, 2015, Georgian Med News, P46
[8]  
ISKROV G, 2014, ORPHAN DRUGS RES REV, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.2147/ODRR.S43409
[9]  
Iskrov G, 2016, HLTH EC POLICY CHALL, P41
[10]   Health Economic Data in Reimbursement of New Medical Technologies: Importance of the Socio-Economic Burden as a Decision-Making Criterion [J].
Iskrov, Georgi ;
Dermendzhiev, Svetlan ;
Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Tsonka ;
Stefanov, Rumen .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 7