Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

被引:69
作者
Barletta, Jeffrey F. [1 ]
Bruno, Jeffrey J. [2 ]
Buckley, Mitchell S. [3 ]
Cook, Deborah J. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Midwestern Univ, Dept Pharm Practice, Coll Pharm Glendale, Glendale, AZ USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Pharm, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Banner Univ, Dept Pharm, Med Ctr, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
critically ill; hemorrhage; histamine-2-receptor antagonist; intensive care; proton pump inhibitor; stress ulcer prophylaxis; PROTON-PUMP INHIBITORS; CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; HISTAMINE-2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; GASTRIC-ACID SUPPRESSION; RISK-FACTORS; INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA; BLEEDING PROPHYLAXIS; III PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000001872
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: Stress ulcer prophylaxis is commonly administered to critically ill patients for the prevention of clinically important stress-related mucosal bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract. Despite widespread incorporation of stress ulcer prophylaxis into practice around the world, questions are emerging about its indications and impact. This clinically focused article will review current controversies related to stress ulcer prophylaxis for critically ill adult patients, including bleeding frequency, risk factors, comparative efficacy, adverse effect profile, and overall cost-effectiveness of the available stress ulcer prophylaxis regimens. Data Sources: A MEDLINE search was conducted from inception through August 2015. Study Selection: Selected publications describing stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult patients were retrieved (original research, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines); their bibliographies were also reviewed to identify additional pertinent-publications. Data Extraction: Data from relevant publications were abstracted and summarized. Data Synthesis: The existing evidence is organized to describe the patients most likely to benefit from stress ulcer prophylaxis, review the comparative efficacy of proton pump inhibitors and histamine 2 receptor antagonists, the adverse effects of stress ulcer prophylaxis, and overall cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: Many stress ulcer prophylaxis recommendations are based on older studies at risk of bias, which may not be applicable to modern practice. Stress ulcer prophylaxis should be limited to patients considered to be at high risk for clinically important bleeding. When evaluating only the trials at low risk for bias, the evidence does not clearly support lower bleeding rates with proton pump inhibitors over histamine 2 receptor antagonists; however, proton pump inhibitors appear to be the dominant drug class used worldwide today. The current rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the relative adverse effects of acid suppression on infectious risk may drive not only the effectiveness, but also the cost-effectiveness of stress ulcer prophylaxis today. Research is currently underway to better address these issues.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1405
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
[21]   Potential risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia in a surgical intensive care unit [J].
Cawley, MJ ;
Wittbrodt, ET ;
Boyce, EG ;
Skaar, DJ .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 19 (01) :108-113
[22]   Randomized, double-blind comparison of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension versus intravenous cimetidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients [J].
Conrad, SA ;
Gabrielli, A ;
Margolis, B ;
Quartin, A ;
Hata, JS ;
Frank, WO ;
Bagin, RG ;
Rock, JA ;
Hepburn, B ;
Laine, L .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (04) :760-765
[23]   A comparison of sucralfate and ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation [J].
Cook, D ;
Guyatt, G ;
Marshall, J ;
Leasa, D ;
Fuller, H ;
Hall, R ;
Peters, S ;
Rutledge, F ;
Griffith, L ;
McLellan, A ;
Wood, G ;
Kirby, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (12) :791-797
[24]   Risk factors for clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation [J].
Cook, D ;
Heyland, D ;
Griffith, L ;
Cook, R ;
Marshall, J ;
Pagliarello, J .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (12) :2812-2817
[25]   RISK-FACTORS FOR GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
FULLER, HD ;
GUYATT, GH ;
MARSHALL, JC ;
LEASA, D ;
HALL, R ;
WINTON, TL ;
RUTLEDGE, F ;
TODD, TJR ;
ROY, P ;
LACROIX, J ;
GRIFFITH, L ;
WILLAN, A ;
NOSEWORTHY, T ;
POWLES, P ;
OPPENHEIMER, L ;
HEWSON, J ;
LANG, J ;
LEE, H ;
GUSLITS, B ;
HEULE, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (06) :377-381
[26]   NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA AND THE ROLE OF GASTRIC PH - A METAANALYSIS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
LAINE, LA ;
GUYATT, GH ;
RAFFIN, TA .
CHEST, 1991, 100 (01) :7-13
[27]  
Cook DJ, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V275, P308, DOI 10.1001/jama.275.4.308
[28]   Proton pump inhibitors as a risk factor for Clostridium difficile diarrhoea [J].
Cunningham, R ;
Dale, B ;
Undy, B ;
Gaunt, N .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2003, 54 (03) :243-245
[29]   Prevention of stress ulceration: Current trends in critical care [J].
Daley, RJ ;
Rebuck, JA ;
Welage, LS ;
Rogers, FB .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (10) :2008-2013
[30]   Proton pump inhibitors increase significantly the risk of Clostridium difficile infection in a low-endemicity, non-outbreak hospital setting [J].
Dalton, B. R. ;
Lye-Maccannell, T. ;
Henderson, E. A. ;
Maccannell, D. R. ;
Louie, T. J. . .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 29 (06) :626-634