Measurement of the contralateral breast photon and neutron dose in breast cancer radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study

被引:1
作者
Bagheri, Hamed [1 ]
Farhood, Bagher [2 ]
Mahdavi, Seied Rabi [3 ]
Shekarchi, Babak [1 ]
Manouchehri, Farhad [4 ]
Esfandbod, Malahat [5 ]
机构
[1] Aja Univ Med Sci, Radiat & Wave Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Kashan Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed Sci, Dept Med Phys & Radiol, Kashan, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Med Phys, Tehran, Iran
[4] Radiat Applicat Sch, Nucl Sci & Technol Res Inst, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Contralateral breast; Monte Carlo; neutron dose; physical wedge; radiotherapy; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CONSERVING SURGERY; DYNAMIC WEDGE; LYMPH-NODES; IRRADIATION; FIELD; IMRT; CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_1426_16
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study aimed to calculate the photon and neutron doses received to the contralateral breast (CB) during breast cancer radiotherapy for various field sizes in the presence of a physical wedge. Materials and Methods: Varian 2100 C/D linear accelerator was simulated using a MCNP4C Monte Carlo code. Then, a phantom of real female chest was simulated and the treatment planning was carried out on tumoral breast (left breast). Finally, the received photon and neutron doses to CB (right breast) were calculated in the presence of a physical wedge for 18 MV photon beam energy. These calculations were performed for different field sizes including 11 cm x 13 cm, 11 cm x 17 cm, and 11 cm x 21 cm. Results: The findings showed that the received doses (both of the photon and neutron) to CB in the presence of a physical wedge for 11 cm x 13 cm, 11 cm x 17 cm, and 11 cm x 21 cm field sizes were 9.87%, 12.91%, and 27.37% of the prescribed dose, respectively. In addition, the results showed that the received photon and neutron doses to CB increased with increment in the field size. Conclusion: From the results of this study, it is concluded that the received photon and neutron doses to CB in the presence of a physical wedge is relatively more, and therefore, they should be reduced to as low as possible. Therefore, using a dynamic wedge instead of a physical wedge or field-in-field technique is suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:1018 / 1023
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Akram M, 2014, INT J RADIAT RES, V12, P295
[2]   Monte Carlo estimation of photoneutrons spectra and dose equivalent around an 18 MV medical linear accelerator [J].
Alem-Bezoubiri, A. ;
Bezoubiri, F. ;
Badreddine, A. ;
Mazrou, H. ;
Lounis-Mokrani, Z. .
RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2014, 97 :381-392
[3]   Contralateral breast dose from chest wall and breast irradiation: local experience [J].
Alzoubi, A. S. ;
Kandaiya, S. ;
Shukri, A. ;
Elsherbieny, E. .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2010, 33 (02) :137-144
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IRAN J MEDICAL PHYS
[5]   Monte Carlo modeling of a 6 and 18 MV Varian Clinac medical accelerator for in-field and out-of-field dose calculations: development and validation [J].
Bednarz, Bryan ;
Xu, X. George .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (04) :N43-N57
[6]   GENOMIC INSTABILITY IN CANCER Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs [J].
Begg, Adrian C. ;
Stewart, Fiona A. ;
Vens, Conchita .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2011, 11 (04) :239-253
[7]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation: Initial report [J].
Bhatnagar, AK ;
Brandner, E ;
Sonnik, D ;
Wu, A ;
Kalnicki, S ;
Deutsch, M ;
Heron, DE .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2004, 10 (06) :381-385
[8]   Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: A phantom model comparison [J].
Borghero, Yerko O. ;
Salehpour, Mohammad ;
McNeese, Marsha D. ;
Stovall, Marilyn ;
Smith, Susan A. ;
Johnson, Jennifer ;
Perkins, George H. ;
Strom, Eric A. ;
Oh, Julia L. ;
Kirsner, Steven M. ;
Woodward, Wendy A. ;
Yu, Tse-Kuan ;
Buchholz, Thomas A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (03) :324-328
[9]  
Brooks P S, 1995, Med Dosim, V20, P301, DOI 10.1016/0958-3947(95)02013-6
[10]  
Chougule Arun, 2007, J Cancer Res Ther, V3, P8