A comparison of three prediction models for predicting monthly precipitation in Liaoyuan city, China

被引:8
作者
Luo, Jiannan [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Wenxi [1 ]
Ji, Yefei [3 ]
Ye, Dajun [4 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Coll Environm & Resources, Minist Educ, Key Lab Groundwater Resources & Environm, 2519 Jiefang Rd, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Construct Engn Coll, 6 Ximinzhu St, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Water Resources, Songliao Water Resources Commiss, 4188 Jiefang Rd, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[4] Hydrol & Water Resources Bur Jilin Prov, Liaoyuan Subbur, 188 Renmin St, Liaoyuan 136200, Peoples R China
来源
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY | 2016年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
artificial neural network; Kriging; Liaoyuan city; monthly precipitation; prediction; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUMMER-MONSOON RAINFALL; INTERPOLATION; AUTOCORRELATION; REGIONS; WAVELET; INDIA;
D O I
10.2166/ws.2016.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of precipitation is of great importance for irrigation management and disaster prevention. In this study, back propagation artificial neural network (BPANN), radial basis function artificial neural network (RBFANN) and Kriging methods were applied and compared to predict the monthly precipitation of Liaoyuan city, China. An autocorrelation analysis method was used to determine model input variables first, and then BPANN, RBFANN and Kriging methods were applied to recognize the relationship between previous precipitation and later precipitation with the monthly precipitation data of 1971-2009 in Liaoyuan city. Finally, the three models' performances were compared based on models accuracy, models stability and models computational cost. Comparison results showed that for model accuracy, RBFANN performed best, followed by Kriging, and BPANN performed worst; for stability and computational cost, RBFANN and Kriging models performed better than the BPANN model. In conclusion, RBFANN is the best method for precipitation prediction in Liaoyuan city. Therefore, the developed RBFANN model was applied to predict the monthly precipitation for 2010-2019 in the study area.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 854
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[22]   An artificial neural network model for rainfall forecasting in Bangkok, Thailand [J].
Hung, N. Q. ;
Babel, M. S. ;
Weesakul, S. ;
Tripathi, N. K. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (08) :1413-1425
[23]  
Kegl B., 2000, RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIO
[24]   Back-propagation neural network for long-term tidal predictions [J].
Lee, TL .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2004, 31 (02) :225-238
[25]   Parameter Automatic Calibration Approach for Neural-Network-Based Cyclonic Precipitation Forecast Models [J].
Lo, Der-Chang ;
Wei, Chih-Chiang ;
Tsai, En-Ping .
WATER, 2015, 7 (07) :3963-3977
[26]   Application of generalized regression neural network and support vector regression for monthly rainfall forecasting in western Jilin Province, China [J].
Lu, Wenxi ;
Chu, Haibo ;
Zhang, Zheng .
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2015, 64 (01) :95-104
[27]   An application of artificial neural networks for rainfall forecasting [J].
Luk, KC ;
Ball, JE ;
Sharma, A .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2001, 33 (6-7) :683-693
[28]   Comparison of surrogate models with different methods in groundwater remediation process [J].
Luo, Jiannan ;
Lu, Wenxi .
JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2014, 123 (07) :1579-1589
[29]   Surrogate Model Application to the Identification of an Optimal Surfactant-Enhanced Aquifer Remediation Strategy for DNAPL-Contaminated Sites [J].
Luo, Jiannan ;
Lu, Wenxi ;
Xin, Xin ;
Chu, Haibo .
JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (06) :1023-1032
[30]  
Luo YF, 2010, THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ISCSCT 2010), P159