Environmental policy stringency and comparative advantage of environmental sensitive goods: a study of textile exports in G20 countries

被引:5
作者
Mahajan, Alisha [1 ]
Majumdar, Kakali [1 ]
机构
[1] Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Univ, Sch Econ, Katra, India
关键词
Environmental stringency; ESG; Panel cointegration; Revealed comparative advantage; Trade; Pollution haven; Porter hypothesis; POLLUTION-INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES; TRANSITION ECONOMIES EVIDENCE; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; PANEL COINTEGRATION; FACTOR PROPORTIONS; AIR-POLLUTION; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-06-2021-0304
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Textile, listed as one of the highly environmentally sensitive goods, its trade is susceptible to be influenced by the implementation of stringent environmental policies. This paper aims to investigate the long-run relationship between revealed comparative advantage (RCA) and Environmental Policy Stringency Index (EPSI) for textile exports of G20 countries in panel data setup. Design/methodology/approach Apart from trend analysis, the authors have employed Pedroni and Westerlund panel cointegration method and fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) method to study the long-run relationship between RCA and EPSI in presence of cross-sectional dependence. Findings A strong link between trade and environmental stringency is observed for textile in the present study. For G20 countries, slight evidence of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis has also been witnessed in the study. Correspondingly, the results reveal the presence of long-run association between the variables under study, implying that stringent environmental policies reduce RCA for some countries, whereas some countries witness the Porter hypothesis. Research limitations/implications The results imply that policy formulation should not aim at limiting the efforts of connecting RCA to environmental stringency but to set trade policies in a wider framework, considering environmental concerns, as these are inseparable subjects. However, this study also provides relevant real-world implications that can support further research. Practical implications The present study has important implications for textile exporters such as green innovations. The Porter hypothesis can be a beneficial tool for G20 exporters in enhancing their export performance, especially for the ones dealing in environmentally sensitive goods. This study offers relevant policy implications and provides directions for future research on global trade and environment nexus. Originality/value This study deals in a debatable area of research that evaluates the interlinkages between environmental stringency and global trade flows in the G20 countries. An important observation of the study is the asymmetrical nature of policy stringency across different countries and its impact on trade. The unavailability of updated data is the limitation of the present study.
引用
收藏
页码:2924 / 2951
页数:28
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]  
Ahmad N, 2017, J APPL ECON BUS RES, V7, P59
[3]  
Albrizios S., 2014, OECD EC DEP WORK PAP, V75, P1, DOI [10.1787/5jxrjnb36b40-en, DOI 10.1787/5JXRJNB36B40-EN]
[4]   The effect of agricultural total factor productivity on environmental degradation in sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Alhassan, Hamdiyah .
SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2021, 12
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook, 1998: Toward Cleaner Production
[6]   Does trade openness affects global carbon dioxide emissions Evidence from the top CO2 emitters [J].
Ansari, Mohd Arshad ;
Haider, Salman ;
Khan, N. A. .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2020, 31 (01) :32-53
[7]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[8]  
Arden-Clarke C., 1993, ENV COMPETITIVENESS, P150
[9]  
Arnold F.S, 1998, ENV PROTECTION IS IT
[10]   Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Evidence from Romania [J].
Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi ;
Caporale, Guglielmo Maria ;
Rault, Christophe ;
Sova, Robert ;
Sova, Anamaria .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 81 :130-139