How economic freedom reflects on the Bitcoin transaction network

被引:7
作者
Ricci, Piergiorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
关键词
Bitcoin; Blockchain; Cryptocurrencies; Social network analysis; Fintech; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; BUREAUCRACY; INFLATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40812-019-00143-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the assumption that economic freedom facilitates the growth of traditional economic sectors, this study seeks to understand the role it plays in fintech sector. For this purpose, by adopting the social network analysis methodological approach, it considers the geographical network of Bitcoin transactions as a proxy to measure the national level of fintech development and compares it with a set of economic freedom indicators related to the top 70 world economies. The analysis revealed significant relationships between the performed network centrality measures and national levels of economic freedom. In particular, as confirmed by the implemented multilevel regression models, high levels of freedom to trade internationally combined with a restrained value of inflation and low administrative requirements can be considered as determining factors for fintech development. The study also showed a large number of Bitcoin transactions conducted in those countries characterized by fewer capital controls and restrictions, a result that feeds suspicions of illegal behavior, such as money laundering or terrorism financing, carried out through the use of cryptocurrencies. Findings of this research might be strategic for fintech entrepreneurship and policymakers interested in designing policies that aim to foster innovative sectors while ensuring the legality of financial flows.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 161
页数:29
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings [J].
Adhami, Saman ;
Giudici, Giancarlo ;
Martinazzi, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2018, 100 :64-75
[2]  
Arvind N., 2016, BITCOIN CRYPTOCURREN, DOI [10.1139/b04-094, DOI 10.1139/B04-094]
[3]  
Auty R.M., 2001, Resource Abundance and Economic Development, P193, DOI [DOI 10.1093/0199275785.001.0001, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199275785.001.0001]
[4]  
Batagelj V., 2003, NETWORKS, DOI [10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.062, DOI 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2007.05.062]
[5]   Choosing strategies to control the bureaucracy: Statutory constraints, oversight, and the committee system [J].
Bawn, K .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 1997, 13 (01) :101-126
[6]  
Berggren N, 2009, INDEP REV
[7]   How Strategic Entrepreneurship and The Institutional Context Drive Economic Growth [J].
Bjornskov, Christian ;
Foss, Nicolai .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (01) :50-69
[8]   The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship [J].
Block, Joern H. ;
Fisch, Christian O. ;
van Praag, Mirjam .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2017, 24 (01) :61-95
[9]   Network Analysis in the Social Sciences [J].
Borgatti, Stephen P. ;
Mehra, Ajay ;
Brass, Daniel J. ;
Labianca, Giuseppe .
SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5916) :892-895
[10]  
Buterin V., 2013, A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform