Noise Source Analysis in Counter-Rotating Open Rotors

被引:10
作者
Smith, Dale A. [1 ]
Filippone, Antonio [1 ]
Barakos, George N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Engn, Computat Fluid Dynam Lab, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
AEROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS; SPECTRAL-ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.J060886
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Because of their potential to reduce aircraft emissions, counter-rotating open rotors (CRORs) have seen a renewed interest in applications, from civil aviation to urban air mobility. However, there are concerns surrounding their acoustic emissions. In the work presented, the authors investigated the noise sources for a range of CROR configurations for a general aviation class aircraft. Numerical models are used to compute the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of these configurations. Further dissection of the various CROR noise sources is then carried out in order to better understand their contribution to CROR noise, and to direct the design of future low-noise CRORs. Noise reductions were observed when the rotor-rotor spacing was increased. Increased contraction of the wake requires the need for increased clipping to reduce the tip vortex interaction source. Noise reductions were also observed in the case of asynchronous rotational speeds. However, this was accompanied by a reduction in propulsive efficiency. Analysis of the CROR in nonaxial flight demonstrated the need to evaluate noise-reducing strategies at off-design conditions. Although the analysis proved the ability to reduce various CROR noise sources, it highlighted that tradeoffs with aerodynamic performance is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:1783 / 1796
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Akkermans R.A., 2012, 18 AIAA CEAS AER C 3, DOI 10.2514/6.2012-2262
[2]  
Akkermans R.A.D., 2014, NEW RESULTS NUMERICA, V124, P593, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-03158-3_60, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03158-3_60]
[3]  
Axelsson O., 1994, ITERATIVE SOLUTION M, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511624100
[4]  
Barakos G., 2005, 31 EUROPEAN ROTORCRA, P91
[5]   Acoustic comparison of propellers [J].
Barakos, G. N. ;
Johnson, C. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROACOUSTICS, 2016, 15 (6-7) :575-594
[6]  
Bradley A.J., 1986, AIAA 10 AER C, DOI 10.2514/6.1986-1894
[7]  
Brandvik T, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2012, VOL 8, PTS A-C, P523
[8]   Numerical aeroacoustic analysis of propeller designs [J].
Chirico, G. ;
Barakos, G. N. ;
Bown, N. .
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 122 (1248) :283-315
[9]   Open rotor interaction noise reduction through front rotor wake modification [J].
Delattre, G. ;
Falissard, F. ;
Vion, L. ;
Jacquin, L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROACOUSTICS, 2016, 15 (1-2) :207-227
[10]   Influence of Torque Ratio on Counter-Rotating Open-Rotor Interaction Noise [J].
Delattre, G. ;
Falissard, F. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2015, 53 (09) :2726-2738