Causes, predictors and consequences of conversion from VATS to open lung lobectomy

被引:47
|
作者
Augustin, Florian [1 ]
Maier, Herbert Thomas [1 ]
Weissenbacher, Annemarie [1 ]
Ng, Caecilia [1 ]
Lucciarini, Paolo [1 ]
Oefner, Dietmar [1 ]
Ulmer, Hanno [2 ]
Schmid, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Surg, Univ Hosp Visceral Transplant & Thorac Surg, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Med Stat Informat & Hlth Econ, Schopfstr 41-1, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2016年 / 30卷 / 06期
关键词
VATS; Conversion; Thoracotomy; Risk factor; ASSISTED THORACIC-SURGERY; THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; OPEN THORACOTOMY; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-015-4492-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To analyze causes, predictors and consequences of conversions from intended VATS lobectomy to open surgery. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Results From 2009 until December 2012, 232 patients were scheduled for anatomical VATS resection. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 15 (6.5 %) patients. Reasons for conversion were bleeding in six, oncologic in five and technical in four patients (adhesions after pleuritis or radiotherapy for other tumors: 3; limited space: 1). In a univariable exact logistic regression analysis, conversion rate was significantly higher in patients after induction therapy (p = 0.019). There was also a statistical trend to a higher conversion rate in patients with larger tumor size (<3 vs. >= 3 cm, p = 0.117) and during the first half of our series (p = 0.107). Conversion rate was not influenced by patient age, nodal stage (pN0 vs. pN+), body mass index, the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung function (FEV1) or benign disease. In a multivariable exact logistic regression, induction treatment (p = 0.013) and tumor size (p = 0.04) were independent significant risk factors for conversion. Conversion did not translate into higher overall postoperative complication rate (33.3 vs. 29.5 %), longer chest drain duration (median, 5 vs. 5 days) or in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 1 %). However, length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the conversion group (median 11 vs. 9 days, p = 0.028). Conclusions Induction therapy was an independent risk factor for conversion to thoracotomy in this VATS lobectomy series. Following induction therapy, patients should be carefully selected for a VATS approach. Conversion to thoracotomy did not increase the postoperative rate of complications or mortality, but significantly increased length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:2415 / 2421
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) Lobectomy After Transitioning from Open Lobectomy
    Kuritzky, Anne M.
    Ryder, Beth A.
    Ng, Thomas
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (08) : 2734 - 2740
  • [32] SURVIVAL, RECURRENCE AND SECOND PRIMARIES AFTER VIDEO-ASSISTED (VATS) LOBECTOMY COMPARED TO OPEN LOBECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Scott, Walter J.
    Allen, Mark S.
    Darling, Gail
    Meyers, Bryan
    Decker, Paul
    Putnam, Joe
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (06) : S381 - S381
  • [33] VATS Versus Open Surgery for Lung Cancer Resection: Moving Toward a Minimally Invasive Approach
    Klapper, Jacob
    D'Amico, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2015, 13 (02): : 162 - 164
  • [34] Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Open Lobectomy in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Cai, Yi-xin
    Fu, Xiang-ning
    Xu, Qin-zi
    Sun, Wei
    Zhang, Ni
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [35] In Hospital Clinical Efficacy, Safety and Oncologic Outcomes from VIOLET: A UK Multi-Centre RCT of VATS Versus Open Lobectomy for Lung Cancer
    Lim, E.
    Batchelor, T.
    Dunning, J.
    Shackcloth, M.
    Anikin, V.
    Naidu, B.
    Belcher, E.
    Loubani, M.
    Zamvar, V.
    Brush, T.
    Dabner, L.
    Harris, R.
    Phillips, D.
    Beard, C.
    Mckeon, H.
    Paramasivan, S.
    Elliott, D.
    Rojas, A. Realpe
    Stokes, E.
    Wordsworth, S.
    Blazeby, J.
    Rogers, C.
    Trialists, T. Violet
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S6 - S6
  • [36] Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open lobectomy in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis
    Chen, F. F.
    Zhang, D.
    Wang, Y. L.
    Xiong, B.
    EJSO, 2013, 39 (09): : 957 - 963
  • [37] Oncological Outcome And Surgical Instruments in VATS Lobectomy For Early Stage Lung Cancer
    Femia, F.
    Guerrera, F.
    Della Beffa, E.
    Cristofori, R. C.
    Filosso, P. L.
    Fontana, E. C.
    Lausi, P. O.
    Lyberis, P.
    Roffinella, M.
    Passone, E.
    Gallo, M.
    Ruffini, E.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (09) : S217 - S218
  • [38] Systemic Inflammation after Uniport, Multiport, or Hybrid VATS Lobectomy for Lung Cancer
    Tacconi, Federico
    Carlea, Federica
    La Rocca, Eleonora
    Vanni, Gianluca
    Ambrogi, Vincenzo
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2022, 70 (03) : 258 - 264
  • [39] Comparison of cost effectiveness between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats) and open lobectomy: a retrospective study
    Chen, Wei
    Yu, Zhanwu
    Zhang, Yichen
    Liu, Hongxu
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [40] Contemporary Predictors of Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Appendectomy
    Wagner, Patrick L.
    Eachempati, Soumitra R.
    Aronova, Anna
    Hydo, Lynn J.
    Pieracci, Frederic M.
    Bartholdi, Marie
    Umunna, Ben-Paul N.
    Shou, Jian
    Barie, Philip S.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2011, 12 (04) : 261 - 266