Strengthening foresight for governance of social-ecological systems: An interdisciplinary perspective

被引:24
作者
Rutting, Lucas [1 ]
Vervoort, Joost [1 ]
Mees, Heleen [1 ]
Driessen, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Foresight; Social -ecological systems; Environmental governance; Critical futures studies; Critical systems theory; Interdisciplinary integration; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE; RESILIENCE THINKING; FUTURE; SCENARIOS; POLITICS; SUSTAINABILITY; ADAPTATION; TRANSITION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.futures.2022.102988
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In recent decades, foresight has been connected to various disciplines that engage with complex societal problems, leading to specific interpretations of foresight. We offer an interdisciplinary perspective on foresight's increasing use for governance of social-ecological systems (SES). We seek to strengthen the use of foresight in this domain by bridging to insights from other disciplines that can help overcome its limitations. Participatory foresight for SES governance offers potential to elicit thinking about uncertainty and complexity, facilitate dialogue between stakeholders, and improve inclusiveness of governance processes, but often fails to be sufficiently reflexive and politically aware to be truly impactful and inclusive. It can be strengthened, we argue, by a more thorough integration with adjacent research fields: critical futures studies, critical systems theory and environmental governance. We distill key insights from these fields, including the importance of being politically reflexive about whose perspectives are considered, whom foresight processes should benefit, and the importance of co-producing methodology and outcomes. We encourage scholars and practitioners to further explore integration with these fields, highlighting the importance of inter- and transdisciplinary teams. Finally, we offer an example for how limitations of foresight as used in a particular field can be overcome through interdisciplinary integration.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]   Emerging pathways for critical futures research: Changing contexts and impacts of social theory [J].
Ahlqvist, Toni ;
Rhisiart, Martin .
FUTURES, 2015, 71 :91-104
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, POWER READER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1978, ADAPTIVE ENV ASSESSM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, THEOR CULT SOC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Journal of Systems Thinking, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-4201-8
[7]   Power in Sustainability Transitions: Analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability [J].
Avelino, Flor .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (06) :505-520
[8]   Power in Transition An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Rotmans, Jan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2009, 12 (04) :543-569
[9]   Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda [J].
Bai, Xuemei ;
van der Leeuw, Sander ;
O'Brien, Karen ;
Berkhout, Frans ;
Biermann, Frank ;
Brondizio, Eduardo S. ;
Cudennec, Christophe ;
Dearing, John ;
Duraiappah, Anantha ;
Glaser, Marion ;
Revkin, Andrew ;
Steffen, Will ;
Syvitski, James .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 39 :351-362
[10]   Strengthening Environmental Foresight: Potential Contributions of Futures Research [J].
Bengston, David N. ;
Kubik, George H. ;
Bishop, Peter C. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (02)