INVESTIGATING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE VANDERBILT ASSESSMENT OF LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION

被引:25
|
作者
Porter, Andrew C. [1 ]
Polikoff, Morgan S. [2 ]
Goldring, Ellen B. [3 ]
Murphy, Joseph [3 ]
Elliott, Stephen N. [4 ]
May, Henry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Consortium Policy Res Educ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Rossier Sch Educ, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Leadership Policy & Org, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Ctr Assessment & Intervent Res, Nashville, TN USA
来源
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL | 2010年 / 111卷 / 02期
关键词
STANDARDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1086/656301
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education (VAL-ED) is a multirater assessment of principals' learning-centered leadership. The instrument was developed based on the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. In this article, we report on the validity and reliability evidence for the VAL-ED accumulated in a national field trial. Using data from more than 270 schools across a wide range of settings, we found that the instrument was reliable for measuring principals' learning-centered leadership. Furthermore, there was mostly positive evidence that the VAL-ED distinguished among subscales of principal performance. In conjunction with findings from the VAL-ED development phase, these results support the conclusion that the VAL-ED can be used by K-12 schools to assess learning-centered leadership.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 313
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characterising the fruit and vegetables consumer ethnocentrism in a southern European Country: An assessment of the reliability and validity of the "CETSCALE" in Portugal
    Miguel, Luis Pedro
    Marques, Susana Henriques
    Duarte, Ana Patricia
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2023, 105
  • [42] The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists
    Barton, John Roger
    Corbett, Sally
    van der Vleuten, Cees Petronella
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (03) : 591 - 597
  • [43] Italian Version of the Laval Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability
    Accardi, Roberto
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Racaniello, Emanuela
    Terzoni, Stefano
    Destrebecq, Anne
    BARIATRIC SURGICAL PRACTICE AND PATIENT CARE, 2017, 12 (03) : 136 - 141
  • [44] Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale
    Hirsch, Oliver
    Keller, Heidemarie
    Mueller-Engelmann, Meike
    Gutenbrunner, Monika Heinzel
    Krones, Tanja
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2012, 15 (04) : 379 - 388
  • [45] Reliability and Validity of a Photo Rating Measure of Alopecia
    Haaga, David A. F.
    Falkenstein, Martha J.
    Banis, Maria
    Malloy, Elizabeth J.
    McDonough, Lauren
    Rogers, Kate
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 37 (04) : 673 - 678
  • [46] Validity and Reliability of Baseline Testing in a Standardized Environment
    Higgins, Kathryn L.
    Caze, Todd
    Maerlender, Arthur
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 33 (04) : 437 - 443
  • [47] Validity and reliability of the FSS in Greek MS patients
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Skordilis, Emmanouil K.
    Giannopoulos, Sotirios
    Stamboulis, Elefterios
    Voumvourakis, Konstantinos
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2013, 2 : 1 - 8
  • [48] Validity and Reliability of Firefighting Simulation Test Performance
    Stevenson, Richard D. M.
    Siddall, Andrew G.
    Turner, Philip J. F.
    Bilzon, James L. J.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 61 (06) : 479 - 483
  • [49] The Reliability and Validity of the Australian Moral Disengagement Scale
    Newton, Nicola C.
    Stapinski, Lexine A.
    Champion, Katrina E.
    Teesson, Maree
    Bussey, Kay
    BEHAVIOUR CHANGE, 2016, 33 (03) : 136 - 149
  • [50] The Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Stalking Risk Profile
    McEwan, Troy E.
    Shea, Daniel E.
    Daffern, Michael
    MacKenzie, Rachel D.
    Ogloff, James R. P.
    Mullen, Paul E.
    ASSESSMENT, 2018, 25 (02) : 259 - 276