Clinical significance of the Kidney Donor Profile Index in deceased donors for prediction of post-transplant clinical outcomes: A multicenter cohort study

被引:7
|
作者
Lee, Jong Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Park, Woo Yeong [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Young Soo [5 ]
Choi, Bum Soon [2 ]
Park, Cheol Whee [2 ]
Yang, Chul Woo [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Yong-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Kyubok [3 ,4 ]
Han, Seungyeup [3 ,4 ]
Chung, Byung Ha [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul St Marys Hosp, Transplant Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol,Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Keimyung Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Daegu, South Korea
[4] Keimyung Univ, Kidney Inst, Daegu, South Korea
[5] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol,Dept Internal Med, Uijongbu, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 10期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
CADAVERIC RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; EXPANDED CRITERIA DONORS; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; RISK INDEX; REJECTION; PATHOLOGY; IMPACT; INJURY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0205011
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background We investigated whether the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) system is useful in predicting clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Methods Four hundred sixty-nine kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) receiving kidneys from 359 deceased donors were included in this study, which involved three transplant centers. KTRs were divided into high and low KDPI KTR groups based on the median KDPI score of 67%. We compared clinical outcomes between the high KDPI and low KDPI groups. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection between high and low KDPI KTR groups. In comparison with histologic findings in allograft tissues obtained within three months from KT, the proportion of glomerulosclerosis was significantly higher in the high KDPI KTR group than in the low KDPI KTR group. With Kaplan-Meier analysis, the graft survival rate was significantly lower in the high KDPI KTR group than in the low KDPI KTR group (Log rank, P = 0.017), and multivariate analysis also demonstrated that a high KDPI score was a significant risk factor for death censored allograft failure (HR 2.62, 95% CI, 1.29 +/- 5.33, P = 0.008). Conclusion The KDPI scoring system is useful in predicting allograft outcomes in a Korean DDKT cohort.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to assess a deceased donor's kidneys' outcome in a European cohort
    Dahmen, Maximilian
    Becker, Felix
    Pavenstaedt, Hermann
    Suwelack, Barbara
    Schuette-Nuetgen, Katharina
    Reuter, Stefan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1) : 11234
  • [22] The impact of kidney donor profile index on delayed graft function and transplant outcomes: A single-center analysis
    Zens, Tiffany J.
    Danobeitia, Juan S.
    Leverson, Glen
    Chlebeck, Peter J.
    Zitur, Laura J.
    Redfield, Robert R.
    D'Alessandro, Anthony M.
    Odorico, Scott
    Kaufman, Dixon B.
    Fernandez, Luis A.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 32 (03)
  • [23] Prediction of clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation from deceased donors with acute kidney injury: a comparison of the KDIGO and AKIN criteria
    Kim, Jeong Ho
    Kim, Young Soo
    Choi, Min Seok
    Kim, Young Ok
    Yoon, Sun Ae
    Kim, Ji-Il
    Moon, In Sung
    Choi, Bum Soon
    Park, Cheol Whee
    Yang, Chul Woo
    Kim, Yong-Soo
    Chung, Byung Ha
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 18
  • [24] The clinical significance of receiving a kidney allograft from deceased donor with chronic histologic changes
    Batal, Ibrahim
    Serban, Geo
    Mohan, Sumit
    Husain, Syed A.
    Vasilescu, Elena-Rodica
    Crew, Russel J.
    Dube, Geoffrey
    Sandoval, P. Rodrigo
    Coley, Shana M.
    Santoriello, Dominick
    Stokes, Michael B.
    D'Agati, Vivette D.
    Cohen, David J.
    Markowitz, Glen
    Hardy, Mark A.
    Ratner, Lloyd E.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (09) : 1795 - 1805
  • [25] Treatment of donors' asymptomatic small kidney stones and post-transplant outcomes: a meta-analysis
    Yin, Saifu
    Zhou, Zhaoxia
    Zhang, Fan
    Wu, Jiapei
    Lin, Tao
    Wang, Xianding
    UROLITHIASIS, 2023, 51 (01)
  • [26] Treatment of donors’ asymptomatic small kidney stones and post-transplant outcomes: a meta-analysis
    Saifu Yin
    Zhaoxia Zhou
    Fan Zhang
    Jiapei Wu
    Tao Lin
    Xianding Wang
    Urolithiasis, 51
  • [27] The impact of neurologically deceased donors' blood pressures on clinical outcomes in transplant recipients: a systematic review
    Basmaji, John
    Reed, Christine
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Ball, Ian M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2020, 67 (09): : 1249 - 1259
  • [28] Histopathological evaluation of pretransplant donor biopsies in expanded criteria donors with high kidney donor profile index: a retrospective observational cohort study
    Sanchez-Escuredo, Ana
    Sagasta, Amaia
    Revuelta, Ignacio
    Rodas, Lida M.
    Paredes, David
    Musquera, Mireia
    Diekmann, Fritz
    Campistol, Josep M.
    Sole, Manel
    Oppenheimer, Federico
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 30 (10) : 975 - 986
  • [29] Outcomes of cPRA 100% deceased donor kidney transplant recipients under the new Kidney Allocation System: A single-center cohort study
    Jackson, Kyle R.
    Chen, Jennifer
    Kraus, Edward
    Desai, Niraj
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Alachkar, Nada
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 (10) : 2890 - 2898
  • [30] Outcomes of induction antibody therapies in the nonbroadly sensitized adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort registry analysis
    Santos, Alfonso H., Jr.
    Li, Yang
    Alquadan, Kawther
    Ibrahim, Hisham
    Leghrouz, Muhannad A.
    Akanit, Uraiwan
    Womer, Karl L.
    Wen, Xuerong
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 33 (08) : 865 - 877