Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications

被引:11
|
作者
Tejwani, Rohit [1 ]
Young, Brian J. [1 ]
Wang, Hsin-Hsiao S. [1 ]
Wolf, Steven [2 ]
Purves, J. Todd [1 ]
Wiener, John S. [1 ]
Routh, Jonathan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Urol Surg, DUMC 3831, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Urology; Pediatrics; Laparoscopic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Complications; PRACTICE PATTERNS; ROBOTIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC COMPLICATIONS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CHILDREN; PREDICTORS; NEPHRECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.01.013
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are anecdotally reported to be increasingly used, but little objective data supports this. Our objective was to assess trends in MIS utilization across various procedures in pediatric urology and to compare postoperative complication rates between MIS and open procedures. Methods We analyzed the 1998-2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We identified children (<18 years old) undergoing open and MIS inpatient procedures and any in-hospital post-operative complications that occurred during that postoperative hospitalization. We utilized propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding factors. Results We identified 163,838 weighted encounters in the "overall cohort," 70,273 of which were at centers performing more than five MIS procedures over the years studied. Use of MIS techniques increased significantly over time for several procedures, most prominently for nephrectomy (Fig.). The overall rate of complications was lower in patients undergoing MIS compared with open surgery (6% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Specialized centers had a significantly lower overall rate of complications than unspecialized centers (9% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Within specialized centers, MIS had lower complication rates than open procedures (7% vs. 9%, p < 0.001); this finding was consistent even after adjusting for other factors (OR 0.71, p = 0.02). Discussion Limitations include that these data may not be generalizable to encounters not in the sample pool. As a large, retrospective, administrative database, NIS may be affected by miscoding bias - rendering our analysis sensitive to the accuracy of procedure coding in NIS. Although the accuracy level of NIS is high for an administrative database, it is possible at least some portion of our cohort may be incorrectly coded. Further, the NSQIP complications we identified may represent associated comorbidities and not true postoperative complications, as NIS does not provide temporal relationships between different diagnosis codes. Despite these limitations, we note that the NIS database is rigorously monitored and audited for coding accuracy and, therefore, represents a reasonably reliable panorama of the characteristics of an inpatient surgical cohort. However, it is important to note that the choice of operative modality is, undoubtedly, multifactorial and patient/setting-specific. Conclusions There is increasing use of MIS for pediatric urology procedures, although utilization rates vary among procedures. MIS was associated with a lower postoperative complication rate than for open procedures. Higher-volume MIS centers have a lower complication rate than lower-volume centers.
引用
收藏
页码:283.e1 / 283.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of minimally invasive versus open surgery in hepatectomy on postoperative wound complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Junli
    Shi, Meiping
    Ding, Wan
    Duan, Mingda
    Dai, Ziqing
    Chen, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (10) : 4159 - 4165
  • [42] Exploring Surgical Strategies for Uterine Fibroid Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Literature on Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches
    Cianci, Stefano
    Gulino, Ferdinando Antonio
    Palmara, Vittorio
    La Verde, Marco
    Ronsini, Carlo
    Romeo, Paola
    Occhipinti, Sara
    Incognito, Giosue Giordano
    Capozzi, Vito Andrea
    Restaino, Stefano
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    Palumbo, Marco
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (01):
  • [43] Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach
    Wei, David
    Johnston, Stephen
    Goldstein, Laura
    Nagle, Deborah
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 610 - 621
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Colon Cancer
    Salem, Jean F.
    Gummadi, Sriharsha
    Marks, John H.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 27 (02) : 303 - +
  • [45] Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Open Pediatric Tibial Fractures
    Ozkul, Emin
    Gem, Mehmet
    Arslan, Huseyin
    Alemdar, Celil
    Azboy, Ibrahim
    Arslan, Seher G.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 36 (04) : 416 - 422
  • [46] The comparison of modified minimally invasive and open surgical approaches in the treatment of epithelial thymic tumours
    Juhos, P.
    Janik, M.
    Lucenic, M.
    Tarabova, K.
    Komarc, M.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2020, 121 (12): : 835 - 839
  • [47] A retrospective study comparing minimally invasive versus open surgical resection of small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms at a tertiary referral center
    Eneholm, Johan
    Beka, Ervin
    Kotan, Robert
    Gimm, Oliver
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (02):
  • [48] Selection of minimally invasive surgical approaches for treating esophageal cancer
    Lee, Yu-Kwang
    Chen, Ke-Cheng
    Huang, Pei-Ming
    Kuo, Shuenn-Wen
    Lin, Mong-Wei
    Lee, Jang-Ming
    THORACIC CANCER, 2022, 13 (15) : 2100 - 2105
  • [49] Minimally invasive versus open thymectomy: a systematic review of surgical techniques, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes
    Hess, Nicholas R.
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    Pennathur, Arjun
    Levy, Ryan M.
    Christie, Neil A.
    Luketich, James D.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 5 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [50] Anal Sphincteroplasty in the Minimally Invasive Era: Assessment of National Trends and Complications
    Kreydin, Evgeniy, I
    Chaudhry, Zaid Q.
    Kazanjian, Kevork K.
    Lin, Anne Y.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2019, 85 (01) : 46 - 51