Development of cancer genetic services in the UK: A national consultation

被引:34
作者
Slade, Ingrid [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Riddell, Daniel [1 ]
Turnbull, Clare [1 ,4 ]
Hanson, Helen [1 ,4 ]
Rahman, Nazneen [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Ethox Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Wellcome Trust Ctr Human Genet, St Annes Coll, Ctr Personalised Med, Oxford OX2 6HS, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
PREDISPOSITION GENES; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PILOTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13073-015-0128-4
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Technological advances in DNA sequencing have made gene testing fast and affordable, but there are challenges to the translation of these improvements for patient benefit. The Mainstreaming Cancer Genetics (MCG) programme is exploiting advances in DNA sequencing to develop the infrastructure, processes and capabilities required for cancer gene testing to become routinely available to all those that can benefit. Methods: The MCG programme held a consultation day to discuss the development of cancer genetics with senior representation from all 24 UK cancer genetic centres. The current service landscape and capacity for expansion was assessed through structured questionnaires. Workshop discussion addressed the opportunities and challenges to increasing cancer gene testing in the National Health Service (NHS). Results: Services vary with respect to population served and models of service delivery, and with respect to methods and thresholds for determining risk and testing eligibility. Almost all centres want to offer more cancer gene testing (82%) and reported increasing demand for testing from non-genetic clinical colleagues (92%). Reported challenges to increasing testing include the complexity of interpreting the resulting genetic data (79%), the level of funding and complexity of commissioning (67%), the limited capacity of current processes and cross-disciplinary relationships (38%), and workforce education (29%). Conclusions: Priorities to address include the development and evaluation of models of increasing access to gene testing, the optimal process for interpretation of large-scale genetic data, implementation of appropriate commissioning and funding processes, and achieving national consistency. The UK cancer genetics community have high expertise and strong commitment to maximising scientific advances for improved patient benefit and should be pivotally involved in the implementation of increased cancer gene testing.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   BRCA Mutation Frequency and Patterns of Treatment Response in BRCA Mutation-Positive Women With Ovarian Cancer: A Report From the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group [J].
Alsop, Kathryn ;
Fereday, Sian ;
Meldrum, Cliff ;
deFazio, Anna ;
Emmanuel, Catherine ;
George, Joshy ;
Dobrovic, Alexander ;
Birrer, Michael J. ;
Webb, Penelope M. ;
Stewart, Colin ;
Friedlander, Michael ;
Fox, Stephen ;
Bowtell, David ;
Mitchell, Gillian .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (21) :2654-2663
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, FAM BREAST CANC CLAS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, OUR INH OUR FUT REAL
[4]   Establish good genomic. practice to guide medicine forward [J].
Barker, Richard W. ;
Brindley, David A. ;
Schuh, Anna .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2013, 19 (05) :530-530
[5]   A toolkit for incorporating genetics into mainstream medical services: Learning from service development pilots in England [J].
Bennett, Catherine L. ;
Burke, Sarah E. ;
Burton, Hilary ;
Farndon, Peter A. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
[6]   Mainstreaming Genetics: A Comparative Review of Clinical Services for Inherited Cardiovascular Conditions in the UK [J].
Burton, H. ;
Alberg, C. ;
Stewart, A. .
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2010, 13 (04) :235-245
[7]  
Burton H., 2011, Genetics and mainstream medicine. Service development and integration
[8]  
Department of Health, 2014, GEN ENGL BRIEF
[9]   Clinical Interpretation and Implications of Whole-Genome Sequencing [J].
Dewey, Frederick E. ;
Grove, Megan E. ;
Pan, Cuiping ;
Goldstein, Benjamin A. ;
Bernstein, Jonathan A. ;
Chaib, Hassan ;
Merker, Jason D. ;
Goldfeder, Rachel L. ;
Enns, Gregory M. ;
David, Sean P. ;
Pakdaman, Neda ;
Ormond, Kelly E. ;
Caleshu, Colleen ;
Kingham, Kerry ;
Klein, Teri E. ;
Whirl-Carrillo, Michelle ;
Sakamoto, Kenneth ;
Wheeler, Matthew T. ;
Butte, Atul J. ;
Ford, James M. ;
Boxer, Linda ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Yeung, Alan C. ;
Altman, Russ B. ;
Assimes, Themistocles L. ;
Snyder, Michael ;
Ashley, Euan A. ;
Quertermous, Thomas .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (10) :1035-1044
[10]   Multiplex Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility: Out on the High Wire Without a Net? [J].
Domchek, Susan M. ;
Bradbury, Angela ;
Garber, Judy E. ;
Offit, Kenneth ;
Robson, Mark E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (10) :1267-1270