More than just error correction - Students' perspectives on their revision processes during writing

被引:52
作者
Myhill, Debra [1 ]
Jones, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Educ & Lifelong Learning, Exeter EX4 4QJ, Devon, England
关键词
editing; composing processes; metacognition; metalinguistic awareness; revision activities; online revision;
D O I
10.1177/0741088307305976
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Drawing on the second phase of a 2-year study of students' linguistic and compositional processes, this article describes students' reflections on their online revision processes, those revisions made during the process of translating thoughts into written text. The data collected were from classroom observation and post hoe interviews with 34 students, who were observed during a writing task in the English classrooms and interviewed subsequently to elicit their reflections and understandings of their own revising processes. The analysis indicates that students tend to conceptualize revision as a macrostrategy and as a task that is predominantly undertaken as a posttextual production reviewing activity. It also indicates that students engage in multiple revising activities during writing, including many revisions that are not concerned with simple matters of surface accuracy, and many students are able to talk about these perceptively and with insight.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 343
页数:21
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ALARMARGOT D, 2001, MODELS WRITING
[2]  
Allal L., 2004, REV WRITTEN LANGUAGE, P87
[3]  
ALLAL L, 2001, REV SUISSE SCI ED, V23, P407
[4]  
[Anonymous], CURRENT PSYCHOL LETT
[5]  
Beach R., 2006, HDB WRITING RES, P222
[6]   The role of comprehension monitoring in children's revision [J].
Beal, CR .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1996, 8 (03) :219-238
[7]  
Bereiter C., 1982, Advances in Instructional Psychology, V2, P1
[8]   A process model of writing development across the life span [J].
Berninger, VW ;
Fuller, F ;
Whitaker, D .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1996, 8 (03) :193-218
[9]   Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence [J].
Butterfield, EC ;
Hacker, DJ ;
Albertson, LR .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1996, 8 (03) :239-297
[10]   The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J].
Chandler, J .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (03) :267-296