How to achieve parsimonious urban land use: The Case of Greater Zurich

被引:0
作者
Walty, Sibylle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Architecture, ETH Wohnforum ETH CASE Ctr Res Architecture Soc &, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Inst Transport Planning & Syst IVT, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Land use regulations; parsimonious land use; projections; spatial analysis; urban growth; Zurich; GROWTH BOUNDARIES; SPRAWL; RESTRICTIONS; ENVIRONMENT; IMPACTS; WALKING; DESIGN; CITIES; RULES; CODES;
D O I
10.1080/09654313.2021.1948973
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use regulations in Switzerland do not meet the requirements of the spatial planning act (SPA) in their guidance for parsimonious land use. If parsimonious land use is to be achieved, urban economic theories and price-based regulations must be leveraged to determine the intensity and balance of land use. Therefore, an urban information system to project and guide for parsimonious land use was developed. The GIS spatial analysis instrument presented in this paper is intended as a decision-making aid in the reform of the land use regulations, in particular metropolitan, cantonal and regional structure plans and municipal land use plans. By intensifying and better balancing land use at locations adequately accessed by public transport, land can be used parsimoniously. However, the projection results are not a self-fulfilling prophecy. Therefore, to guide for parsimonious land use regulations need to change from normative, static and exclusionary to context-dependent, conditional, dynamic and inclusionary ones. The next step is to develop a system of fees and codes to internalize negative externalities of building and transport and to collect public revenue from economic and agglomeration rents.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 310
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Planning without plans? Nomocracy or teleocracy for social-spatial ordering [J].
Alexander, E. R. ;
Mazza, Luigi ;
Moroni, Stefano .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2012, 77 :37-87
[2]   To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs [J].
Alfonzo, MA .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2005, 37 (06) :808-836
[3]  
Alonso William., 1964, Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent.
[4]  
Barr, 2018, SKYSCRAPERS CITIES 1
[5]  
Bertaud A, 2018, ORDER WITHOUT DESIGN: HOW MARKETS SHAPE CITIES, P1
[6]   Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs [J].
Bertaud, A ;
Brueckner, JK .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2005, 35 (02) :109-125
[7]  
BFS (Bundesamt fur Statistik), 2015, SZEN BEV SCHWEIZ 201
[8]  
Brueckner J.K., 2011, Lectures on Urban Economics
[9]   Urban growth boundaries: An effective second-best remedy for unpriced traffic congestion? [J].
Brueckner, Jan K. .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (3-4) :263-273
[10]   Measuring welfare gains from relaxation of land-use restrictions: The case of India's building-height limits [J].
Brueckner, Jan K. ;
Sridhar, Kala Seetharam .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2012, 42 (06) :1061-1067