Attitudes and Policy Responses to Australian Farm Dam Safety Threats: Comparative Lessons for Water Resources Managers

被引:10
作者
Pisaniello, John D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Sustainable Law & Engn Grp, Ctr Accounting Governance & Sustainabil, Sch Commerce, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
The author acknowledges the Department of Primary Industries and Water; Tasmania; especially Mr. Sam Ditchfield; Mr. Ludovic Schmidt and Dr. Alan Harradine for information on the Tasmanian Dams Safety policy and its progress. Appreciation to the NSW Dams Safety Committee; especially Mr. Norm Himsley and Mr. Michael Karp; for assistance and valuable information. Thanks also to all the stakeholders in Victoria and NSW and the key policy actors in SA; Victoria and NSW that participated in the surveys. The author acknowledges the Australian Research Council for Discovery Project funding to undertake the research. From the University of South Australia; appreciation goes to Prof. Jennifer McKay for her involvement in the Discovery research; Ms. Kirsty Willis for specialist contributions in stakeholder and key-actor surveys; Mr. Arthur Spassis for valuable research assistance; and Prof. Roger Burritt; for his recent interest in and support for the spillway-blocking surveys and cumulative-threats research;
D O I
10.1080/07900627.2010.489306
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The safety of medium- and large-scale dams is addressed in many countries, but limited attention is paid to problems associated with smaller farm dams, particularly potential cumulative threats posed in larger catchments. Farmers in Australia often overlook the common law obligation to review and design dams in line with current standards. The result is downstream communities, property and environment placed at risk. This paper demonstrates the significance of this problem with case studies undertaken in policy-absent South Australia, policy-driven Victoria and policy-strong New South Wales, including empirical evidence on attitudes and responses of landholders and key policy actors. This demonstrates need for supervision of small dams. Tasmania is included as a case study as it represents a policy-model state on how this can be best achieved in line with international best-practice. The four cases provide useful comparative lessons. Policy guidelines applicable to any jurisdiction are included; their application is illustrated with the case studies. The paper considers the policy implications of these lessons for Australia in particular and the world in general.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 402
页数:22
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] ANCOLD, 1992, B ANCOLD, V91, P9
  • [2] ANCOLD, 2003, GUID DAM SAF MAN
  • [3] ANCOLD, 2000, GUID SEL ACC FLOOD C
  • [4] ANCOLD, 1972, REP SAF SURV DAMS
  • [5] [Anonymous], SA485 LDC SMEC S AUS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2000, GUID ASS CONS DAM FA
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2009, BBC NEWS 0327
  • [8] [Anonymous], P 23 HYDR WAT RES S
  • [9] [Anonymous], AUSTR CONSTITUTIONAL
  • [10] [Anonymous], AUSTR J WATER RESOUR