Fischer-Tropsch route for the conversion of biomass to liquid fuels - Technical and economic analysis

被引:53
作者
Snehesh, Ail Shivananda [1 ]
Mukunda, H. S. [2 ]
Mahapatra, Sadhan [3 ]
Dasappa, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Ctr Sustainable Technol, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci, Dept Aerosp Engn, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[3] Tezpur Univ, Dept Energy, Tezpur, India
关键词
Biomass gasification; Fischer-Tropsch; Liquid fuel; Techno-economic analysis; INTEGRATED PROCESS; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; PROCESS DESIGN; PRODUCER GAS; GASIFICATION; TECHNOLOGY; POWER; COPRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.101
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The techno-economics of biomass gasification systems for the production of Fischer-Tropsch (FT) based liquid fuels are analysed by estimating the overall mass and energy conversion of biomass to liquid (BTL) fuel. The investigation of BTL systems for 1000 kg/h biomass gasification system and an expected liquid hydrocarbon output of 1500 tonnes are estimated. The cost analysis, based on the annualized life cycle of the systems, includes a steam-oxygen based biomass gasification plant paired with the FT unit. The gasifier considered in this analysis is the downdraft reactor design, operating on oxygen-steam gasifying medium at an equivalence ratio of 0.1 and a steam-to-biomass ratio in the range of 0.8-1.2 to generate syngas with H-2/CO ratio of 2.1:1, ideally suitable for the cobalt based fixed bed FT reactor. The mass and energy balance reveal that for a once-through FT reactor configuration, substantial energy exists in the gas phase, which includes C1-05 hydrocarbons and unconverted syngas. The study suggests that the product gas be utilized in an IC engine and converted to electricity, for in-house power demands and for the sale of excess electricity to the grid. The analysis indicates a market competitive liquid fuel production with CO conversion greater than 60%, at a cost ranging from INR 35-40/litre (0.5-0.6 USD/litre) alongside electricity as a major co-product in the BTL system. This study examines the economics of building economically affordable and environmentally favourable BTL systems of smaller throughputs with particular reference to India. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 191
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]  
DeKlerk A, 2011, FISCHER-TROPSCH REFINING, P1, DOI 10.1002/9783527635603
[12]  
Engineering, 2016, L RECTISOL WAS PROCE
[13]   Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt [J].
Fargione, Joseph ;
Hill, Jason ;
Tilman, David ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Hawthorne, Peter .
SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5867) :1235-1238
[14]   Thermochemical biomass to liquid (BTL) process: Bench-scale experimental results and projected process economics of a commercial scale process [J].
Gardezi, Syed Ali ;
Joseph, Babu ;
Prado, Faustino ;
Barbosa, Alejandro .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 59 :168-186
[15]   Import demand of crude oil and economic growth: Evidence from India [J].
Ghosh, Sajal .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (02) :699-702
[16]   Reactors for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [J].
Guettel, Robert ;
Kunz, Ullrich ;
Turek, Thomas .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 31 (05) :746-754
[17]   Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels - A literature survey [J].
Haarlemmer, Geert ;
Boissonnet, Guillaume ;
Peduzzi, Emanuela ;
Setier, Pierre-Alexandre .
ENERGY, 2014, 66 :667-676
[18]   Techno-environmental analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer-Tropsch integrated process for the co-production of bio-fuel and power [J].
Im-orb, Karittha ;
Arpornwichanop, Amornchai .
ENERGY, 2016, 112 :121-132
[19]   Influence of Particle Size and Single-Tube Diameter on Thermal Behavior of Fischer-Tropsch Reactors. Part I. Particle Size Variation for Constant Tube Size and Vice Versa [J].
Jess, Andreas ;
Kern, Christoph .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 35 (02) :369-378
[20]   Large-scale gasification-based coproduction of fuels and electricity from switchgrass [J].
Larson, Eric D. ;
Jin, Haiming ;
Celik, Fuat E. .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2009, 3 (02) :174-194