Debris-flow impact, vulnerability, and response

被引:90
作者
Santi, P. M. [1 ]
Hewitt, K. [2 ]
VanDine, D. F. [3 ]
Cruz, E. Barillas [4 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Geol & Geol Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Cold Reg Res Ctr, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
[3] VanDine Geol Engn Ltd, Victoria, BC, Canada
[4] Serv Geol Profes, Guatemala City, Guatemala
关键词
Debris flow; Socio-cultural; Mitigation; Vulnerability; DESIGN; HAZARD; PREDICTION; MAGNITUDE; COLORADO; AREAS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-010-9576-8
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper calls attention to vulnerable groups that are disproportionately affected by smaller, less-publicized debris flow events and do not always receive the advantages of recent technical advances. The most vulnerable groups tend to be economically restricted to live in relatively inexpensive and more dangerous locations, are often forced to live in topographically cramped areas due to expansion and development, and have limited influence and power needed to bring about mitigative efforts. Technical issues have long been the focus for debris-flow hazard reduction, but the collective judgment of many of those working toward natural hazards reduction, especially in developing countries, is that socio-cultural issues are at least as important as technical choices on the effectiveness of hazard and risk-reduction efforts. This awareness may result in (1) selecting simple designs that use local materials, local construction techniques and skills, and that recognize limited financial means; (2) selecting mitigative methods that require minimal maintenance, can withstand exposure to vandalism and scavenging, and will minimize misappropriation of resources; and (3) capitalizing on local techniques of dealing with other hazards, such as flooding, earthquakes, and landslides. Because of the difficulty in predicting and controlling debris flows, it is useful if mitigative systems can employ multiple elements to enhance the chance of success. These can include: education of the local populace, avoidance and warning to the degree possible, and some combination of channelization and interception of debris. For watersheds disturbed by fire, logging, mining, or construction, hillside treatment can be added to the mitigative methods to reduce water flow and sediment transport. Examples provided in this paper show that these mitigative systems can be tailored to fit widely varying socio-cultural settings, with different geological characteristics and different debris flow-triggering events.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 402
页数:32
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Debris flow disaster at Larcha, upper Bhotekoshi Valley, central Nepal [J].
Adhikari, DP ;
Koshimizu, S .
ISLAND ARC, 2005, 14 (04) :410-423
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RED CHILD MORT VIT N
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, MOUNTAIN HAZARDS CHI
[4]   A debris-flow alarm system for the Alpine Illgraben catchment: design and performance [J].
Badoux, Alexandre ;
Graf, Christoph ;
Rhyner, Jakob ;
Kuntner, Richard ;
McArdell, Brian W. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 49 (03) :517-539
[5]  
Balducci V, 2010, RAINFALL THRESHOLDS
[6]  
Bankoff G., 2004, MAPPING VULNERABILIT
[7]  
BATISTA F, 2004, ROLE LOCAL INSTITUTI
[8]  
BERNARD D, 2007, THESIS COLORADO SCHO
[9]   Prediction of debris flow inundation areas using empirical mobility relationships [J].
Berti, Matteo ;
Simoni, Alessandro .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2007, 90 (1-2) :144-161
[10]   Postfire seeding for erosion control: Effectiveness and impacts on native plant communities [J].
Beyers, JL .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (04) :947-956