How can advance care planning tools help young people's voices be heard?

被引:5
作者
Trang, Jacinta [1 ]
Herbert, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Sansom-Daly, Ursula M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Childrens Hosp, Childrens Hlth Queensland Hosp & Hlth Serv, POB 3474, Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Ctr Childrens Hlth Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Sydney Childrens Hosp, Kids Canc Ctr, Behav Sci Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Randwick Clin Campus, UNSW Med & Hlth, Discipline Paediat,Sch Clin Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Prince Wales Sydney Childrens Hosp, Sydney Youth Canc Serv, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
adolescent; advance care planning; developmental; general paediatrics; palliative care; OF-LIFE COMMUNICATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; END; ADOLESCENTS; CHILDREN; ADULTS; DISCUSSIONS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/jpc.16095
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The integration of the child or young person (CYP) in conversations around advance care planning (ACP) is an important area of paediatric practice. These discussions provide CYP with the opportunity to voice their values, goals and preferences, enabling health-care professionals to ensure they are aligned with their planned course of treatment. This process, often undertaken within the context of the child's family, empowers children to participate in decisions and experience the dignity of self-determination. It also facilitates an increased understanding between the CYP and those involved in their care. The objectives of this paper are to highlight the importance of these conversations for paediatricians and identify barriers, both real and perceived, that may prevent them from engaging with a CYP about their preferences for future care including focusing more on discussion with the parents, and concern about or not having the skills to engage the child in such sensitive conversations. Triggers that can prompt clinicians to undertake ACP are also discussed. A further complexity is that after seeking their perspective, it may become apparent that the CYP may hold different views and perspectives to their parents and/or clinician. This review article will especially examine elements of end-of-life conversations that are critical to support the important goal of listening to the voice of the CYP. This includes considerations around timing, legal aspects, ethical tensions that arise when amplifying a child's voice, clinician/team-member roles, clinical process considerations, and the use of specific interventions and ACP tools to facilitate these conversations with CYP.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1322
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Advance care planning: Advance directives for healthcare
[2]  
Bird S, 2011, AUST FAM PHYSICIAN, V40, P159
[3]   Legacy perceptions and interventions for adults and children receiving palliative care: A systematic review [J].
Boles, Jessika C. ;
Jones, Maile T. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (03) :529-551
[4]   The "surprise' question in paediatric palliative care: A prospective cohort study [J].
Burke, Kimberley ;
Coombes, Lucy Helen ;
Menezes, Antoinette ;
Anderson, Anna-Karenia .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (02) :535-542
[5]  
*CAN PAED SOC, 2008, PAED CHILD HEALT-CAN, V13, P791, DOI DOI 10.1093/PCH/13.9.791
[6]  
Chambers L., 2018, A Guide to Children's Palliative Care, Together for Short Lives, VFour
[7]  
Chief Parliamentary Counsel, MED TREATM PLANN DEC
[8]  
Common-Practice, HELL GAM 2022
[9]  
de Arruda-Colli Marina Noronha Ferraz, 2018, Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol, V6, P341, DOI 10.1037/cpp0000254
[10]  
Department-Health Human-Services, THINK AH FRAM PLANN