Pest Control and Pollination Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hedgerow Restoration in a Simplified Agricultural Landscape

被引:115
作者
Morandin, L. A. [1 ]
Long, R. F. [2 ]
Kremen, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ecol Consulting, Victoria, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, 70 Cottonwood St, Woodland, CA 95695 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
hedgerow; pest control; pollination; economics; WILD BEE ABUNDANCE; CROP POLLINATION; NATIVE BEES; FRUIT-SET; SERVICES; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; INCREASE; HABITAT;
D O I
10.1093/jee/tow086
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Field edge habitat in homogeneous agricultural landscapes can serve multiple purposes including enhanced biodiversity, water quality protection, and habitat for beneficial insects, such as native bees and natural enemies. Despite this ecosystem service value, adoption of field border plantings, such as hedgerows, on large-scale mono-cropped farms is minimal. With profits primarily driving agricultural production, a major challenge affecting hedgerow plantings is linked to establishment costs and the lack of clear economic benefits on the restoration investment. Our study documented that hedgerows are economically viable to growers by enhancing beneficial insects and natural pest control and pollination on farms. With pest control alone, our model shows that it would take 16 yr to break even from insecticide savings on the US$ 4,000 cost of a typical 300-m hedgerow field edge planting. By adding in pollination benefits by native bees, where honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) may be limiting, the return time is reduced to 7 yr. USDA cost share programs allow for a quicker return on a hedgerow investment. Our study shows that over time, small-scale restoration can be profitable, helping to overcome the barrier of cost associated with field edge habitat restoration on farms.
引用
收藏
页码:1020 / 1027
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   The Global Stock of Domesticated Honey Bees Is Growing Slower Than Agricultural Demand for Pollination [J].
Aizen, Marcelo A. ;
Harder, Lawrence D. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (11) :915-918
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, YOLO COUNTY CROP REP
[3]  
Bates D., 2012, R package version 0.999375-42
[4]   Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and the pollination services provided to a pollination-dependent crop [J].
Blaauw, Brett R. ;
Isaacs, Rufus .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2014, 51 (04) :890-898
[5]   Factors affecting adoption of hedgerows and other biodiversity-enhancing features on farms in California, USA [J].
Brodt, Sonja ;
Klonsky, Karen ;
Jackson, Louise ;
Brush, Stephen B. ;
Smukler, Sean .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2009, 76 (01) :195-206
[6]   Exploring farmers' cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes [J].
Burton, Rob. J. F. ;
Kuczera, Carmen ;
Schwarz, Gerald .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2008, 48 (01) :16-37
[7]   Natural and within-farmland biodiversity enhances crop productivity [J].
Carvalheiro, Luisa Gigante ;
Veldtman, Ruan ;
Shenkute, Awraris Getachew ;
Tesfay, Gebreamlak Bezabih ;
Pirk, Christian Walter Werner ;
Donaldson, John Sydney ;
Nicolson, Susan Wendy .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 14 (03) :251-259
[8]  
Chaplin-Kramer Rebecca, 2011, Rangelands, V33, P33
[9]   Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services [J].
Dale, Virginia H. ;
Polasky, Stephen .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 64 (02) :286-296
[10]   Large-Scale Deployment of Seed Treatments Has Driven Rapid Increase in Use of Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Preemptive Pest Management in US Field Crops [J].
Douglas, Margaret R. ;
Tooker, John F. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (08) :5088-5097