Trust but Verify: The Oracle Paradox of Blockchain Smart Contracts

被引:22
作者
Albizri, Abdullah [1 ]
Appelbaum, Deniz [2 ]
机构
[1] Montclair State Univ, Feliciano Sch Business, Dept Informat Management & Business Analyt, Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
[2] Montclair State Univ, Feliciano Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Montclair, NJ USA
关键词
blockchain; smart contracts; supply chain; IoT; provenance; oracle; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH; CHALLENGES; SECURITY; INTERNET; THINGS;
D O I
10.2308/ISYS-19-024
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Although research shows that blockchain provides fairly immutable virtual provenance workflows, proof that the blockchain accurately represents physical events lacks truly independent verification. This dilemma, the Oracle Paradox, challenges blockchain architecture and is perhaps one reason why businesses have hesitated to adopt smart contracts. Blockchain proponents claim that people can serve as trusted Oracles in a smart contract. However, auditing research shows that people are the weak link in almost every internal control application, including those pertaining to blockchain. People are susceptible to collusion, bribery, error, and fraud and these tendencies are not entirely mitigated by blockchain technologies (Balagurusamy et al. 2019; Nakamoto 2008). This research proposes a framework to mitigate the paradox of the Oracle: A Business Process Management ( BPM) model of a Blockchain Smart Contract-enabled supply chain with IoT as the sole ``third-party'' Oracle participant, utilizing design science research.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   "The first mile problem": Deriving an endogenous demand for auditing in blockchain-based business processes [J].
Alles, Michael ;
Gray, Glen L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 38
[2]  
Alzahrani N, 2018, P 1 WORKSHOP CRYPTOC, P30, DOI DOI 10.1145/3211933.3211939
[3]   Internet of Things: A survey on the security of IoT frameworks [J].
Ammar, Mahmoud ;
Russello, Giovanni ;
Crispo, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 38 :8-27
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, INTERNET THINGS IS G
[5]  
[Anonymous], BYZANTIUM VERSION
[6]   Auditing Cloud-Based Blockchain Accounting Systems [J].
Appelbaum, Deniz ;
Nehmer, Robert A. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 34 (02) :5-21
[7]  
Asolo B., 2018, BLOCKCHAIN ORACLES E
[8]   Crypto anchors [J].
Balagurusamy, V. S. K. ;
Cabral, C. ;
Coomaraswamy, S. ;
Delamarche, E. ;
Dillenberger, D. N. ;
Dittmann, G. ;
Friedman, D. ;
Gokce, O. ;
Hinds, N. ;
Jelitto, J. ;
Kind, A. ;
Kumar, A. D. ;
Libsch, F. ;
Ligman, J. W. ;
Munetoh, S. ;
Narayanaswami, C. ;
Narendra, A. ;
Paidimarri, A. ;
Delgado, M. A. P. ;
Rayfield, J. ;
Subramanian, C. ;
Vaculin, R. .
IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 63 (2-3)
[9]  
BlockchainHub, 2019, WHATS BLOCKCHAIN ORA
[10]   Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms [J].
Bolton, Ruth N. ;
McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. ;
Cheung, Lilliemay ;
Gallan, Andrew ;
Orsingher, Chiara ;
Witell, Lars ;
Zaki, Mohamed .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (05) :776-808