What we still don't know about polyploidy

被引:283
作者
Soltis, Douglas E. [1 ]
Buggs, Richard J. A. [1 ]
Doyle, Jeff J. [2 ]
Soltis, Pamela S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Biol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Plant Biol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Florida Museum Nat Hist, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
allopolyploidy; autopolyploidy; ecology; physiology; polyploid formation; 2N POLLEN FORMATION; GENE-EXPRESSION; PLOIDY LEVEL; CHAMERION-ANGUSTIFOLIUM; TRAGOPOGON-MISCELLUS; GENOME DUPLICATION; WHOLE-GENOME; NICHE DIFFERENTIATION; EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS; FUNCTIONAL DIVERGENCE;
D O I
10.1002/tax.595006
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
During the past decade there has been a tremendous resurgence of interest in polyploidy that has in large part been stimulated by the development of increasingly powerful genetic and genomic tools. The result has been numerous new insights into the genomic and genetic consequences of polyploidy. The plethora of new discoveries has dramatically reshaped traditional views and concomitantly revealed that polyploidy is a highly dynamic and ubiquitous process. These recent advances in our understanding of polyploidy have stimulated numerous reviews, most focused on the various genetic, epigenetic, and genomic consequences of polyploid evolution. Whereas genetic and genomic attributes of polyploidization have received considerable attention, other crucial areas of polyploid evolution have received much less (e.g., ecology, pollination biology, physiology). The focus of this paper is not to review again recent discoveries, but to emphasize what we do not yet know about polyploidy, which despite all that has been learned about genome doubling is still an enormous amount. Our list is not meant to be comprehensive, but includes a range of topics that we have placed in several general categories, including mode of formation, ecological and physiological consequences, and genomic rules. Questions include: What is (are) the most frequent mechanism(s) of polyploidization? What factors promote/facilitate polyploidization? What factors favor autopolyploid vs. allopolyploid formation? Do multiple origins result in lineages with differing evolutionary trajectories and/or cryptic species? Our major goals are to stimulate discussion and promote further research.
引用
收藏
页码:1387 / 1403
页数:17
相关论文
共 210 条
[1]   Evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploid and hybrid plants [J].
Adams, Keith L. .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2007, 98 (02) :136-141
[2]   Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing [J].
Adams, KL ;
Cronn, R ;
Percifield, R ;
Wendel, JF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (08) :4649-4654
[3]   Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants [J].
Adams, KL ;
Wendel, JF .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2005, 8 (02) :135-141
[4]   Crop-to-weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): Spontaneous interspecific hybridization between johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense, and crop sorghum, S-bicolor [J].
Arriola, PE ;
Ellstrand, NC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1996, 83 (09) :1153-1159
[5]   Butterfly seed predation:: effects of landscape characteristics, plant ploidy level and population structure [J].
Arvanitis, Leena ;
Wiklund, Christer ;
Ehrlen, Johan .
OECOLOGIA, 2007, 152 (02) :275-285
[6]  
Baack EJ, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P1936
[7]   Distribution and diversity of cytotypes in Dianthus broteri as evidenced by genome size variations [J].
Balao, Francisco ;
Casimiro-Soriguer, Ramon ;
Talavera, Maria ;
Herrera, Javier ;
Talavera, Salvador .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2009, 104 (05) :965-973
[8]   Multiple Paleopolyploidizations during the Evolution of the Compositae Reveal Parallel Patterns of Duplicate Gene Retention after Millions of Years [J].
Barker, Michael S. ;
Kane, Nolan C. ;
Matvienko, Marta ;
Kozik, Alexander ;
Michelmore, W. ;
Knapp, Steven J. ;
Rieseberg, Loren H. .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2008, 25 (11) :2445-2455
[9]   Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants [J].
Barringer, Brian C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 94 (09) :1527-1533
[10]   Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms [J].
Beaulieu, Jeremy M. ;
Leitch, Ilia J. ;
Patel, Sunil ;
Pendharkar, Arjun ;
Knight, Charles A. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2008, 179 (04) :975-986