Optimal tattoo removal in a single laser session based on the method of repeated exposures

被引:65
作者
Kossida, Theodora [1 ]
Rigopoulos, Dimitrios [1 ]
Katsambas, Andreas [1 ]
Anderson, R. Rox [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol 1, Andreas Sygros Hosp, Athens 11528, Greece
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp,Wellman Ctr Photomed, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
efficacy; laser; multiple exposure; Q-switched; removal; tattoo; SWITCHED RUBY-LASER; MICROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; PICOSECOND; NM; PIGMENT; LIGHT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2011.07.024
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Unwanted tattoos are treated with Q-switched lasers. Despite a series of treatments, efficacy is limited. Objective: We compared a single Q-switched laser treatment pass with 4 treatment passes separated by 20 minutes. Methods: Eighteen tattoos on 12 adults were divided in half and randomized. One half received a single treatment pass (the "conventional" method) with a Q-switched alexandrite laser (5.5 J/cm(2), 755 nm, 100-nanosecond pulse duration, 3-mm spot size), and the other half received 4 treatment passes with an interval of 20 minutes between passes (the "R20" method). Tattoo lightening was compared 3 months later, by blinded evaluation of photographs. Biopsy specimens obtained before and immediately after treatment on both halves were also compared in blinded fashion. Results: Immediate whitening reaction occurred on the first treatment pass, with little or no whitening on subsequent passes. Three months later, treatment with the R20 method was much more effective than conventional single-pass laser treatment (P <.01; all tattoos favored the R20 method). Despite greater epidermal injury with the R20 method, neither method caused adverse events or scarring. Light microscopy showed greater dispersion of tattoo ink with the R20 method. Limitations: This prospective study involved a small number of subjects. Conclusions: The R20 method is much more effective than conventional laser tattoo treatment, removing most tattoos in a single treatment session. New laser device technology is not required to practice this method. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;66:271-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 277
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Q-SWITCHED ALEXANDRITE LASER TREATMENT (755 NM) OF PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR TATTOOS [J].
ALSTER, TS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 33 (01) :69-73
[2]   SELECTIVE PHOTOTHERMOLYSIS - PRECISE MICROSURGERY BY SELECTIVE ABSORPTION OF PULSED RADIATION [J].
ANDERSON, RR ;
PARRISH, JA .
SCIENCE, 1983, 220 (4596) :524-527
[3]   Laser treatment of tattoos [J].
Bernstein, EF .
CLINICS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 24 (01) :43-55
[4]   Q-switched laser treatment of tattoos [J].
CesarioKelly, KM ;
Nelson, JS .
LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 12 (02) :89-98
[5]  
Ferguson JE, 1997, BRIT J DERMATOL, V137, P405, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1997.18581951.x
[6]   USE OF THE ALEXANDRITE LASER (755-NM, 100-NSEC) FOR TATTOO PIGMENT REMOVAL IN AN ANIMAL-MODEL [J].
FITZPATRICK, RE ;
GOLDMAN, MP ;
RUIZESPARZA, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1993, 28 (05) :745-750
[7]   Adverse events associated with nonablative cutaneous visible and infrared laser treatment [J].
Handley, Julian M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 55 (03) :482-489
[8]   A clinical and histologic prospective controlled comparative study of the picosecond titanium:sapphire (795 nm) laser versus the Q-switched alexandrite (752 nm) laser for removing tattoo pigment [J].
Herd, RM ;
Alora, MB ;
Smoller, B ;
Arndt, KA ;
Dover, JS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 40 (04) :603-606
[9]   Safety and Effectiveness of Black Tattoo Clearance in a Pig Model After a Single Treatment With a Novel 758 nm 500 Picosecond Laser: A Pilot Study [J].
Izikson, Leonid ;
Farinelli, William ;
Sakamoto, Fernanda ;
Tannous, Zeina ;
Anderson, R. Rox .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (07) :640-646
[10]   Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: A national data set [J].
Laumann, Anne E. ;
Derick, Amy J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 55 (03) :413-421