Safety and effectiveness of direct acting antivirals for treatment of hepatitis C virus in patients with solid organ transplantation

被引:26
|
作者
Mansour, Marlina [1 ]
Hill, Lucas [2 ]
Kerr, Janice [3 ]
机构
[1] UC San Diego Hlth, Dept Pharm Serv, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] UC San Diego Hlth, Dept Hepatol, San Diego, CA USA
[3] UC San Diego Hlth, Abdominal Transplantat, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
direct acting antivirals; drug-drug interactions; hepatitis C virus; immunosuppression; rejection; solid organ transplantation; SOFOSBUVIR PLUS RIBAVIRIN; GENOTYPE; RECIPIENTS; INFECTION; LEDIPASVIR; SURVIVAL; EFFICACY; KIDNEY; MULTICENTER; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1111/tid.12972
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of greater than 90% in most patients. However, data evaluating DAA use in transplant patients are limited. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HCV treatment in this high-risk population. Methodology: This single-center retrospective study included liver, kidney, lung, and/or heart transplant patients who were treated for HCV infection with DAAs. The primary objective was to identify drug-drug interactions between DAAs and immunosuppressants by comparing immunosuppression dosages and levels at baseline and week 4 of HCV treatment. As secondary objectives, we described the percentage of patients with new or worsening rejection and/or graft dysfunction during HCV treatment, and the percentage of study patients who achieved SVR. Results: Of the 108 patients included, the majority had liver (76%) or kidney (13%) transplants. Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir was the most commonly prescribed HCV treatment (33.9%) and tacrolimus was the most common immunosuppressant (91%). We did not detect a statistically significant difference in immunosuppression dosages or levels during HCV treatment. Furthermore, only one patient (< 1%) experienced rejection and five patients (4.6%) had six episodes of graft dysfunction while on DAAs. Efficacy was high with 98% of patients achieving SVR. Conclusion: DAAs appear to be safe and effective for HCV treatment in patients with a history of liver and/or kidney transplantation. More data are needed to evaluate DAAs in lung and/or heart transplant patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Direct-Acting Antivirals and Organ Transplantation: Is There Anything We Can't Do?
    Kappus, Matthew R.
    Wolfe, Cameron R.
    Muir, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 222 : S794 - S801
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals for treatment-naive patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection
    Zhu, Xiaobo
    Wang, Mingqi
    Liu, Mei
    Yu, Xinghao
    Huang, Peng
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (05) : 421 - 429
  • [23] Influence of drug-drug interactions on effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus
    Margusino-Framinan, Luis
    Cid-Silva, Purificacion
    Gimenez-Arufe, Victor
    Mondelo-Garcia, Cristina
    Fernandez-Oliveira, Carla
    Mena-de-Cea, Alvaro
    Martin-Herranz, Isabel
    Castro-Iglesias, Angeles
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2021, 28 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [24] Direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus-infected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Tajiri, Kazuto
    Ito, Hiroyuki
    Kawai, Kengo
    Kashii, Yoshiro
    Hayashi, Yuka
    Murayama, Aiko
    Minemura, Masami
    Takahara, Terumi
    Shimizu, Yukihiro
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 14 (06) : 1190 - 1199
  • [25] Outcomes of antiviral treatment in hepatitis C virus liver transplant patients off immunosuppression in the direct acting antivirals era: A case series
    Campos-Varela, Isabel
    Agudelo, Eliana Z.
    Terrault, Norah A.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 32 (07)
  • [26] Optimising management of patients with hepatitis C virus in the age of direct-acting antivirals: results of a Delphi consensus
    Di Marco, V
    Alberti, A.
    Angarano, G.
    Colombo, M.
    Di Perri, G.
    Gaeta, G. B.
    Ippolito, G.
    Mangia, A.
    Pasqualetti, P.
    Craxi, A.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (20) : 7024 - 7033
  • [27] Reactivation of hepatitis B in patients of chronic hepatitis C with hepatitis B virus infection treated with direct acting antivirals
    Yeh, Ming-Lun
    Huang, Chung-Feng
    Hsieh, Meng-Hsuan
    Ko, Yu-Min
    Chen, Kuan-Yu
    Liu, Ta-Wei
    Lin, Yi-Hung
    Liang, Po-Cheng
    Hsieh, Ming-Yen
    Lin, Zu-Yau
    Chen, Shinn-Cherng
    Huang, Ching-I
    Huang, Jee-Fu
    Kuo, Po-Lin
    Dai, Chia-Yen
    Yu, Ming-Lung
    Chuang, Wan-Long
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 (10) : 1754 - 1762
  • [28] Efficacy, Safety, and Predictors of Direct-acting antivirals in Hepatitis C Virus Patients with Heterogeneous Liver Diseases
    De Pace, Vanessa
    Morelli, Maria Cristina
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Maggi, Fabrizio
    Galli, Silvia
    Vero, Vittoria
    Re, Maria Carla
    Cescon, Matteo
    Pistello, Mauro
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2019, 42 (04) : 189 - 196
  • [29] Hepatitis C virus vaccines in the era of new direct-acting antivirals
    Shi, Chao
    Ploss, Alexander
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 7 (02) : 171 - 185
  • [30] Misidentification of recombinant hepatitis C virus leading to treatment failure with direct acting antivirals
    Mourez, Thomas
    Decroos, Amandine
    Goria, Odile
    Montialoux, Helene
    De Oliveira, Fabienne
    Larrat, Sylvie
    Plantier, Jean-Christophe
    Riachi, Ghassan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2018, 90 (05) : 994 - 997