共 50 条
Safety and effectiveness of direct acting antivirals for treatment of hepatitis C virus in patients with solid organ transplantation
被引:26
|作者:
Mansour, Marlina
[1
]
Hill, Lucas
[2
]
Kerr, Janice
[3
]
机构:
[1] UC San Diego Hlth, Dept Pharm Serv, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] UC San Diego Hlth, Dept Hepatol, San Diego, CA USA
[3] UC San Diego Hlth, Abdominal Transplantat, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词:
direct acting antivirals;
drug-drug interactions;
hepatitis C virus;
immunosuppression;
rejection;
solid organ transplantation;
SOFOSBUVIR PLUS RIBAVIRIN;
GENOTYPE;
RECIPIENTS;
INFECTION;
LEDIPASVIR;
SURVIVAL;
EFFICACY;
KIDNEY;
MULTICENTER;
EXPERIENCE;
D O I:
10.1111/tid.12972
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: The direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of greater than 90% in most patients. However, data evaluating DAA use in transplant patients are limited. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HCV treatment in this high-risk population. Methodology: This single-center retrospective study included liver, kidney, lung, and/or heart transplant patients who were treated for HCV infection with DAAs. The primary objective was to identify drug-drug interactions between DAAs and immunosuppressants by comparing immunosuppression dosages and levels at baseline and week 4 of HCV treatment. As secondary objectives, we described the percentage of patients with new or worsening rejection and/or graft dysfunction during HCV treatment, and the percentage of study patients who achieved SVR. Results: Of the 108 patients included, the majority had liver (76%) or kidney (13%) transplants. Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir was the most commonly prescribed HCV treatment (33.9%) and tacrolimus was the most common immunosuppressant (91%). We did not detect a statistically significant difference in immunosuppression dosages or levels during HCV treatment. Furthermore, only one patient (< 1%) experienced rejection and five patients (4.6%) had six episodes of graft dysfunction while on DAAs. Efficacy was high with 98% of patients achieving SVR. Conclusion: DAAs appear to be safe and effective for HCV treatment in patients with a history of liver and/or kidney transplantation. More data are needed to evaluate DAAs in lung and/or heart transplant patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文