Micromechanical modeling of the microbond test to quantify the interfacial properties of fiber-reinforced composites

被引:91
作者
Nishikawa, M. [2 ]
Okabe, T. [1 ]
Hemmi, K. [2 ]
Takeda, N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808579, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778561, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Dept Adv Energy, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778561, Japan
关键词
fiber-reinforced composites; microbond test; interface; matrix cracking; micromechanical modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.02.021
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The present study has focused on achieving a micromechanical understanding of the microbond test, which involves pulling a fiber out of a bead of matrix (i.e. droplet) through a knife-edge, in order to quantify the interfacial fracture properties of fiber-reinforced composites. According to the microbond test results for carbon-fiber and epoxy-resin system, matrix cracking occurred during the fiber pullout, in addition to the debonding at the fiber-matrix interface. Therefore, in evaluating the fracture properties of the fiber-matrix interface, we should pay attention to the coupling effects of matrix failure and interfacial debonding on the test results. Then, we discuss how to best extract the interfacial properties while excluding the influence of matrix plasticity and cracking, using numerical simulations. The key mechanism demonstrated here is that the pullout force, in the cases where the influence of matrix cracking is negligible, appears as the upper limit among the experimental data of the pullout force for a constant initial embedded length of the fiber in the matrix. For this reason, the upper-limit data all over the range of embedded fiber length in experiments can be reasonably evaluated by the simulation focusing on the debonding process with matrix plasticity. This evaluation technique is effective as a way of extracting interfacial properties appropriately from microbond test results. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4098 / 4113
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Finite element evaluation of the microbond test: meniscus effect, interphase region, and vise angle [J].
Ash, JT ;
Cross, WM ;
Svalstad, D ;
Kellar, JJ ;
Kjerengtroen, L .
COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 63 (05) :641-651
[2]   Dynamic fiber debonding and frictional push-out in model composite systems: numerical simulations [J].
Bi, X ;
Li, Z ;
Geubelle, PH ;
Lambros, J .
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2002, 34 (07) :433-446
[3]   ACCURATE MEASUREMENT OF CONTACT-ANGLE, PHASE CONTACT AREAS, DROP VOLUME, AND LAPLACE EXCESS PRESSURE IN DROP-ON-FIBER SYSTEMS [J].
CARROLL, BJ .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1976, 57 (03) :488-495
[4]   YIELDING OF STEEL SHEETS CONTAINING SLITS [J].
DUGDALE, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1960, 8 (02) :100-104
[5]  
GURSON AL, 1977, T ASME, P2
[6]   COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF FIBER MATRIX ADHESION IN COMPOSITES [J].
HERRERAFRANCO, PJ ;
DRZAL, LT .
COMPOSITES, 1992, 23 (01) :2-27
[7]   Mechanics of materials: Top-down approaches to fracture [J].
Hutchinson, JW ;
Evans, AG .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2000, 48 (01) :125-135
[8]   A MICROBOND METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF THE SHEAR-STRENGTH OF A FIBER-RESIN INTERFACE [J].
MILLER, B ;
MURI, P ;
REBENFELD, L .
COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 28 (01) :17-32
[9]  
Murakami S, 1981, CREEP STRUCTURES, P422, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-81598-0_28
[10]  
NISHIKAWA M, MICROSTRUCTURE UNPUB