Brief Opioid Overdose Knowledge (BOOK): A Questionnaire to Assess Overdose Knowledge in Individuals Who Use Illicit or Prescribed Opioids

被引:45
作者
Dunn, Kelly E. [1 ]
Barrett, Frederick S. [1 ]
Yepez-Laubach, Claudia [1 ]
Meyer, Andrew C. [3 ]
Hruska, Bryce J. [3 ]
Sigmon, Stacey C. [3 ,4 ]
Fingerhood, Michael [2 ]
Bigelow, George E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Behav Pharmacol Res Unit, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychiat, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
chronic pain; naloxone; opioid use disorder; opioids; overdose; NALOXONE DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS; AMAZONS MECHANICAL TURK; UNITED-STATES; PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS; HEROIN OVERDOSE; AGING QUIZ; DEATHS; ABUSE; DRUG; INCREASES;
D O I
10.1097/ADM.0000000000000235
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Opioid overdose is a public health crisis. This study describes efforts to develop and validate the Brief Opioid Overdose Knowledge (BOOK) questionnaire to assess patient knowledge gaps related to opioid overdose risks. Methods: Two samples of illicit opioid users and a third sample of patients receiving an opioid for the treatment of chronic pain (total N = 848) completed self-report items pertaining to opioid overdose risks. Results: A 3-factor scale was established, representing Opioid Knowledge (4 items), Opioid Overdose Knowledge (4 items), and Opioid Overdose Response Knowledge (4 items). The scale had strong internal and face validity. Patients with chronic pain performed worse than illicit drug users in almost all items assessed, highlighting the need to increase knowledge of opioid overdose risk to this population. Conclusions: This study sought to develop a brief, internally valid method for quickly assessing deficits in opioid overdose risk areas within users of illicit and prescribed opioids, to provide an efficient metric for assessing and comparing educational interventions, facilitate conversations between physicians and patients about overdose risks, and help formally identify knowledge deficits in other patient populations.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 323
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Results From the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, NSDUH Series H-48
[3]   What heroin users tell us about overdose [J].
Baca, Catherine T. ;
Grant, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2007, 26 (04) :63-68
[4]   The Underrecognized Toll of Prescription Opioid Abuse on Young Children [J].
Bailey, J. Elise ;
Campagna, Elizabeth ;
Dart, Richard C. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 53 (04) :419-424
[5]   Comparing the Similarity of Responses Received from Studies in Amazon's Mechanical Turk to Studies Conducted Online and with Direct Recruitment [J].
Bartneck, Christoph ;
Duenser, Andreas ;
Moltchanova, Elena ;
Zawieska, Karolina .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04)
[6]   Association Between Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Opioid Overdose-Related Deaths [J].
Bohnert, Amy S. B. ;
Valenstein, Marcia ;
Bair, Matthew J. ;
Ganoczy, Dara ;
McCarthy, John F. ;
Ilgen, Mark A. ;
Blow, Frederic C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (13) :1315-1321
[7]   An online daily diary study of alcohol use using Amazon's Mechanical Turk [J].
Boynton, Marcella H. ;
Richman, Laura Smart .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2014, 33 (04) :456-461
[8]  
Brown T.A., 2008, Confirmatory Factor analysis for applied research
[9]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[10]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2012, 10 LEAD CAUS DEATH A