Disentangling social media influence in crises: Testing a four-factor model of social media influence with large data

被引:56
作者
Zhao, Xinyan [1 ]
Zhan, Mengqi [2 ]
Liu, Brooke F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Crisis communication; Social media influence; Measurement; Influencer; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; OPINION; POWER; NETWORKS; ORGANIZATIONS; LEADERSHIP; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.08.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Social media empower publics by providing a platform for their voices during crises. Digital enabled platforms allow individuals to become influentials by sharing their insights and expertise with others. Confronted with the fast-paced and complex dynamics of crises, we lack a systematic conceptualization and a valid measure of social media influence in the crisis context. By integrating diverse perspectives on influence, we propose a new framework that theorizes different dimensions of social media influence based on publics' communicative behaviors during crises. This integrated framework offers a refined conceptualization and measurement of social media influence in crises by incorporating the network perspective. We tested the framework with large-scale Twitter data from four crises. Results from multigroup CFA on Twitter influencers suggest that social media influence is composed of four factors: output, reactive outtake, proactive outtake, and network positioning. Each factor is associated with a distinct set of users' behavioral indicators (e.g., retweet). Implications for crisis communication and public relations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 561
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities [J].
Agostino, Deborah .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2013, 39 (03) :232-234
[2]  
[Anonymous], THE PEOPLES CHOICE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, P 16 ACM C C INF KNO, DOI DOI 10.1145/1321440.1321588
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, A structural theory of social influence
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Time
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Wall Street Journal
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Forbes
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Measure What Matters: Online tools for understanding customers, social media, engagement, and key relationships
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WOMEN HEALTH
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P INT AAAI C WEB SOC, DOI DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V4I1.14033