Test of an environmental flow release in a British Columbia river: does more water mean more fish?

被引:67
作者
Bradford, Michael J. [1 ]
Higgins, Paul S. [2 ]
Korman, Josh [3 ]
Sneep, Jeff
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Sch Resource & Environm Management, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S8, Canada
[2] BC Hydro & Power Author, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[3] Ecometr Res, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
environmental flow release; hierarchical Bayesian modelling; instream flows; Oncorhynchus; SALMON ONCORHYNCHUS-TSHAWYTSCHA; TROUT POPULATIONS; THERMAL REGIMES; MANAGEMENT; RESPONSES; PREDICTIONS; ASSESSMENTS; FRAMEWORK; ABUNDANCE; INCREASE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02633.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Water managers must make difficult decisions about the allocation of streamflows between out-of-channel human uses and environmental flows for aquatic resources. However, the effects environmental flows on stream ecosystems are infrequently evaluated. 2. We used a 13-year experiment in the regulated Bridge River, British Columbia, Canada, to determine whether an environmental flow release designed to increase salmonid productivity was successful. A hierarchical Bayesian model was used to compare juvenile Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) abundance before and after the flow release. 3. We found that the total number of salmonids did increase after the release, but most of the gains could be attributed to the rewatering of a previously dry channel located immediately below the dam. In reaches that had flowing water during the baseline period, the response of individual salmon species to the increase in flow was variable, and there was little change in total abundance after the flow release. Our results were inconsistent with both habitat modelling, which predicted a decrease in habitat quality with increasing flow, and holistic instream flow approaches, which imply greater benefits with larger flows. 4. We question whether biotic responses to flow changes can be predicted reliably with currently available methods and suggest that adaptive management or the use of decision tools that account for the uncertainty in the biotic response is required for instream flow decisions when the competing demands for water are great.
引用
收藏
页码:2119 / 2134
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive [J].
Acreman, M. C. ;
Ferguson, A. J. D. .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01) :32-48
[2]  
Anderson KE, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P309, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[309:IFNISA]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Big dams and salmon evolution: changes in thermal regimes and their potential evolutionary consequences [J].
Angilletta, Michael J., Jr. ;
Steel, E. Ashley ;
Bartz, Krista K. ;
Kingsolver, Joel G. ;
Scheuerell, Mark D. ;
Beckman, Brian R. ;
Crozier, Lisa G. .
EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2008, 1 (02) :286-299
[5]  
Arthington AH, 2006, ECOL APPL, V16, P1311, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities [J].
Arthington, Angela H. ;
Naiman, Robert J. ;
McClain, Michael E. ;
Nilsson, Christer .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01) :1-16
[8]  
Bovee K.D., 1982, GUIDE STREAM HABITAT
[9]   Low Flows, Instream Flow Needs and Fish Ecology in Small Streams [J].
Bradford, Michael J. ;
Heinonen, John S. .
CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES JOURNAL, 2008, 33 (02) :165-180