Pure and compensated technical efficiency of Swedish dairy farms

被引:0
作者
Gordana, Manevska-Tasevska [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ewa, Rabinowicz [2 ]
Yves, Surry Rene [3 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, AgriFood Econ Ctr, Box 7013, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, AgriFood Econ Ctr, Box 730, S-22007 Lund, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, Box 7013, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
compensated technical efficiency; dairy farms; environmental support; pure technical efficiency; Sweden; SWEDEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The compensatory effect of environmental subsidies for agri-environmental output constraints was evaluated through a comparative analysis observing the 'pure' technical efficiency, as a benchmark for prevailing production conditions, and the 'compensated' technical efficiency, as a proxy indicator of the compensation. An unbalanced data panel covering 3578 observations of 668 Swedish dairy farms in the period 2002-2012 was used. The analysis showed that in the study period, environmental farm support decreased the differences in farm revenue generated by agri-environmental output constraints in Sweden. However, the environmental support distribution did not succeed in meeting regional needs, so difficulties emerged in farmers' ability to generate output in southern and central forest and valley areas of Sweden. Furthermore, the environmental agricultural support had only a partial subsidisation effect on 'output-reducing' farm management practices, with full compensation being achieved for organic and capital-extensive farming, whereas low livestock density farming was not sufficiently compensated for. This analysis reveals incentives with policy implications for farm technical performance and provides direct input to future policy recommendations for environmental support allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Parmeter C.F., 2014, Foundations and Trends (R) in Econometrics, V7, P191, DOI [10.1561/0800000023, DOI 10.1561/0800000023]
  • [32] Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe
    Prager, Katrin
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 12 : 59 - 66
  • [33] Rasmussen S., 2011, 1 FOI U COP I FOOD R, V2011
  • [34] Stochastic efficiency measurement: The curse of theoretical consistency
    Sauer, Johannes
    Frohberg, Klaus
    Hockmann, Heinrich
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2006, 9 (01) : 139 - 165
  • [35] Sipilainen T., 2009, Acta Agricultura Scandinavica. Section C, Food Economics, V6, P173, DOI 10.1080/16507541.2010.481901
  • [36] Sipilainen T., 2008, EUR ASS AGR EC INT C
  • [37] Opportunity costs of providing crop diversity in organic and conventional farming: would targeted environmental policies make economic sense?
    Sipilainen, Timo
    Huhtala, Anni
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 (03) : 441 - 462
  • [38] Statistics Sweden, 2014, JORDBR ARSB 2014 KAP
  • [39] Swedish Board of Agriculture, 2015, JORDB STAT PRIS OCH
  • [40] Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
    Tilman, D
    Cassman, KG
    Matson, PA
    Naylor, R
    Polasky, S
    [J]. NATURE, 2002, 418 (6898) : 671 - 677