Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity

被引:74
作者
Vanderklift, MA [1 ]
Ward, TJ [1 ]
Phillips, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Div Marine Res, N Beach, WA 6020, Australia
关键词
biodiversity; taxonomic resolution; marine protected areas; reserve selection; surrogate;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00036-6
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
One of the main reasons for establishing networks of marine protected areas (MPAs) is to conserve and manage biodiversity. Of the many elements to biodiversity, representation of species diversity is a common target. As preparing a complete inventory of all marine species is impractical, surrogates to represent species diversity have been sought. One such surrogate is lower taxonomic resolution. Based on the distributions of 977 taxa of fish, invertebrates and plants in a temperate marine bay, we used species richness as a measure of biodiversity to examine the value of using assemblages generated from species, genus, family and class level data as surrogates in a selection process for MPAs. Genus assemblages resulted in selection of areas with a similar number of species to those obtained by using species assemblages, provided the selected set of areas represented 60% or more of the assemblage occurrences. Results using family and class assemblages varied. Because spatial scale, geographic location and the identity of the taxonomic group are all likely to affect the efficacy of using lower taxonomic resolution as a surrogate for species diversity, we argue that there is no universally preferred level. This requires further study at different spatial scales and among different locations, using a range of taxonomic groups, and we therefore suggest that the use of lower taxonomic resolution survey data to select MPAs should be approached with caution. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 315
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, LIVING OCEAN UNDERST
[2]  
[Anonymous], MANAGING MARINE ENV
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
Austin, 1991, NATURE CONSERVATION, P176, DOI 10.1071/9780643101241
[5]   A NEW APPROACH TO THE SPECIES CLASSIFICATION PROBLEM IN FLORISTIC ANALYSIS [J].
AUSTIN, MP ;
BELBIN, L .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1982, 7 (01) :75-89
[6]   ENVIRONMENTAL REPRESENTATIVENESS - REGIONAL PARTITIONING AND RESERVE SELECTION [J].
BELBIN, L .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1993, 66 (03) :223-230
[7]   COMPARING 3 CLASSIFICATION STRATEGIES FOR USE IN ECOLOGY [J].
BELBIN, L ;
MCDONALD, C .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (03) :341-348
[8]   VARIATION IN ASSEMBLAGES OF FISH ASSOCIATED WITH DEEP AND SHALLOW MARGINS OF THE SEAGRASS POSIDONIA-AUSTRALIS [J].
BELL, JD ;
FERRELL, DJ ;
MCNEILL, SE ;
WORTHINGTON, DG .
MARINE BIOLOGY, 1992, 114 (04) :667-676
[9]  
BOND WJ, 1989, BIOTIC DIVERSITY SO
[10]  
BRUNCKHORST DJ, 1994, MARINE PROTECTED ARE, P12