Algorithmic aspects of Roman domination in graphs

被引:14
作者
Padamutham, Chakradhar [1 ]
Palagiri, Venkata Subba Reddy [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Warangal 506004, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Roman domination; Tree convex bipartite graph; NP-complete; APX-complete; EMPIRE; SETS;
D O I
10.1007/s12190-020-01345-4
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
For a simple, undirected graph G = (V, E), a Roman dominating function (RDF) f :V -> {0, 1, 2} has the property that, every vertex u with f (u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f (v) = 2. The weight of a RDF is the sum f (V) = Sigma(v is an element of V) f (v). The minimum weight of a RDF is called the Roman domination number and is denoted by (gamma R)(G). Given a graph G and a positive integer k, the Roman domination problem (RDP) is to check whether G has a RDF of weight at most k. The RDP is known to be NP-complete for bipartite graphs. We strengthen this result by showing that this problem remains NP-complete for two subclasses of bipartite graphs namely, star convex bipartite graphs and comb convex bipartite graphs. We show that (gamma R)(G) is linear time solvable for bounded tree-width graphs, chain graphs and threshold graphs, a subclass of split graphs. The minimum Roman domination problem (MRDP) is to find a RDF of minimum weight in the input graph. We show that the MRDP for star convex bipartite graphs and comb convex bipartite graphs cannot be approximated within (1 - epsilon) ln |V| for any epsilon > 0 unless NP subset of DT IME(|V|(O(log log |V|))) and also propose a 2(1+ ln(Delta + 1))-approximation algorithm for theMRDP, where Delta is the maximum degree of G. Finally, we show that the MRDP is APX-complete for graphs with maximum degree 5.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 102
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Some APX-completeness results for cubic graphs
    Alimonti, P
    Kann, V
    [J]. THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2000, 237 (1-2) : 123 - 134
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, THESIS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, INTRO ALGORITHMS
  • [4] Roman domination in graphs
    Cockayne, EJ
    Dreyer, PA
    Hedetniemi, SM
    Hedetniemi, ST
    [J]. DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 2004, 278 (1-3) : 11 - 22
  • [5] THE MONADIC 2ND-ORDER LOGIC OF GRAPHS .1. RECOGNIZABLE SETS OF FINITE GRAPHS
    COURCELLE, B
    [J]. INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 1990, 85 (01) : 12 - 75
  • [6] On the Roman domination number of a graph
    Favaron, O.
    Karami, H.
    Khoeilar, R.
    Sheikholeslami, S. M.
    [J]. DISCRETE MATHEMATICS, 2009, 309 (10) : 3447 - 3451
  • [7] A threshold of in n for approximating set cover
    Feige, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1998, 45 (04) : 634 - 652
  • [8] Garey M. R., 1979, Computers and intractability. A guide to the theory of NP-completeness
  • [9] Haynes T. W., 1998, FUNDAMENTALS DOMINAT, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781482246582
  • [10] Henning M., 2002, DISCUSS MATH GRAPH T, V22, P325